New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[FEM] Missing 1D beam analysis example for Start WB due to upstream CCX wrong results for 1D beam #5701
Comments
@ickby also confirmed this issue |
I do not belive we will be able to fix it for 0.21. This is a problem by design of CalculiX. AFAIK the situation improved around 2020, but AFAIK in some circumstances Calculix still gives resultes an engineer would not expect for 1D analysis. Do you have any special reason for bringing this up? Is there someone around who is willing to have a look at this? cheers bernd |
Sorry, bad assumption on my part @berndhahnebach 🙏 |
Because of this issue we do not have a 1D FEM example on start WB. |
Issue imported from https://tracker.freecad.org/view.php?id=3056
Original report text
The start wb only has FEM 3D and 2D analysis example of CalculiX cantilever. This is because the 1D example gives results an engineer would not expect. At the moment no example is added but the 1D beams are still supported.
I opened the bug report to have a reference. I have been in contact with the developer of CalculiX, the FEM solver we use. There seems to be some mathematical reasons for the problem.
Everything could be read at the forum topic:
https://forum.freecadweb.org/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=16044
Other bug information
Discussion from Mantis ticket
Comment by @berndhahnebach 2020-01-09 10:59
related: https://forum.freecadweb.org/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=42294
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: