-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 26
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Underlining, legibility, accessibility #485
Comments
Color blindness is an issue. How do you know something is a link unless you hover over it? |
Tab is my honest answer (not being facetious). |
Noted. A link should always be visible. |
Sorry, I did not intend to close that issue. |
Now, I understand why links are upsetting me recently:
I found a partial solution. https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/discussions/bad-update-to-119-0/m-p/44178/highlight/true#M15956 |
Do some searches for |
Thanks. Via https://caniuse.com/?search=text-underline-offset: Might an offset work, with monospaced text, and with line spacing as (very nicely) set in #482? I wonder … Since I discovered the reason for unexpected underlines (the commit by Mozilla), and the extension with which I can remove underlines from FreshPorts (thanks to a Mozilla developer), I'm happy for this issue to be closed. |
I don't have time to read right now. |
I did think about underlining of links, during the presentation of texts aspect of #474, but held back. To not overcomplicate the issue.
After previewing
dev
pages such as https://dev.freshports.org/date.php?date=2023/10/24 with Dark Reader in Firefox, I'm in two minds.For legibility: my instinct is to have links underlined only when pointed at, however I don't know how best to strike a balance between legibility (for the sighted) and accessibility.
Related FreeBSD bug reports:
@pauamma your thoughts?
Thanks
For myself, I can probably do something with an extension such as Stylus.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: