Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature Request] Fake duplex sorting feature #209

Closed
tk4arts opened this issue May 24, 2023 · 6 comments
Closed

[Feature Request] Fake duplex sorting feature #209

tk4arts opened this issue May 24, 2023 · 6 comments

Comments

@tk4arts
Copy link

tk4arts commented May 24, 2023

When using a non duplex ADF Scanner, it is only possible to scan duplex documents by manually scan every page into one document and turn every page after every scan.
The desired function would be to scan all front pages and then all back pages in the same document. Then this document should automatically be sorted that the pages are sorted correctly.
Example:
5 pages (10 sides, duplex)

  1. Step scan 5 front pages
  2. Step scan 5 back pages
  3. Now Sorting is 1,3,5,7,9,10,8,6,4,2
  4. Step Fake duplex sorting to Sort pages 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10
@tk4arts
Copy link
Author

tk4arts commented May 24, 2023

My Idea on that topic would be an extension of the Pdf Page Organizer.
This needs to get the total number of pages and fill the csv sorting field with the following schema.
n = Number of pages:
1,n,2,n-1,3,n-2,....,n/2,n-(n/2-1)

@Frooodle
Copy link
Member

image

@Frooodle
Copy link
Member

Frooodle commented May 26, 2023

Just finished making this, there will be dropdown option for custom modes in next release with pre-selected organisation

Will be included next release whenever that will be

@tk4arts
Copy link
Author

tk4arts commented May 26, 2023

Hi,
Thanks for the quick integration. One question is it now implemented as in the screenshot? Because when you scan with a non duplex scanner you have first all the fronts and then all the backs, but the backs are in reversed order since the papers have been turned around.

so the sorting should not be:
1,n/2+1,2,…
Because then the sorting from my initial post would be: 1,10,3,8,…

It should rather be like in my second post:
1,n,2,n-1,…

I hope it is clear what I meant.

And thanks again for the great work!

@Frooodle
Copy link
Member

Just made correction i see what you meant now, thanks for re-explaining

@Frooodle
Copy link
Member

This should be live with alpha tag now will release later in week

@Frooodle Frooodle closed this as completed Jun 4, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants