Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

More privacy friendly Maps options needed: OpenStreetmap #128

Open
MacLemon opened this issue Oct 1, 2018 · 7 comments
Open

More privacy friendly Maps options needed: OpenStreetmap #128

MacLemon opened this issue Oct 1, 2018 · 7 comments
Labels
needs-triage Issue needs to be evaluated, discussed and tagged user requested

Comments

@MacLemon
Copy link

MacLemon commented Oct 1, 2018

Summary:
More privacy friendly Maps options needed

Steps to Reproduce:
Create an event location.
Look at the location, have Google Maps set multiple tracking cookies on your machine.

Expected Results:
Maps should be more privacy respecting to the visitors by using a different map service, or at least offer a choice of maps services with the most privacy preserving one being the general default.

Actual Results:
Google Maps is integrated and tracks all visitors, even if the instance owner/admin doesn't want to track visitors.

Regression:
All content should only be loaded from the local instance and nowhere else ideally.
In case of Maps, this is likely quite complex.

Quote from the https://gettogether.community/about/privacy/

[You can mention Google services here and link to Google's privacy policy if you want].

You must be compliant with GDPR and hence that mentioning of Google is not optional but absolutely mandatory.
The same would apply to any other mapping service, but unlike Google, OpenStreetmap does not track their users.

Notes:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/ would be a better suited default mapping service that respects user's privacy and offers a lot of helpful local information.

Ideally The site would proxy all the OSM data through itself to abstract any user's connection by only exposing the instance's IPs to the mapping service. This would also reduce load on the mapping servers and allow for speedier connections due tile caching becoming possible. (Would increase server traffic a little, but that's worth the increased privacy protection.)

Version Information:
GetTogether 0.8

@mhall119
Copy link
Collaborator

The privacy policy has been updated to explicitly mention Google Maps.

In order to replace it with OpenStreetMaps, we would need somebody to implement the features we use Google Maps for on top of OSM, and also we need to know what the API call limits are on OSM.org

@mhall119 mhall119 added the needs-triage Issue needs to be evaluated, discussed and tagged label Dec 31, 2018
@craigmaloney
Copy link
Contributor

Not sure how things are currently implemented but we could use something like Leaflet to help ease the transition (https://leafletjs.com/)

@7usr7local
Copy link

I'd like to see a "User requested" badge/label here 🙂

@brylie
Copy link

brylie commented Jan 17, 2019

Either Leaflet (mentioned above) or OpenLayers would provide an abstraction to support multiple map providers.

What are the features that would need to be implemented on top of the map layer?

@mhall119
Copy link
Collaborator

In addition to showing the map, we need to be able to place pins showing known Places and also to be able to retrieve Place data from the map's data sources based on a clicked location.

@craigmaloney
Copy link
Contributor

Quick thought: Is there the concept of a private place? If not then that would be something to keep in mind (not all places should be places that are exposed to all users).

@mhall119
Copy link
Collaborator

Not yet, but I think there's an open issue for that (and private events altogether)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
needs-triage Issue needs to be evaluated, discussed and tagged user requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants