Is QuicTransport obsolete?

[guest271314]

Is QuicTransport and obsolete per QuicTransport => WebTransport OT #4208?

Should a webstransport directory be created housing Examples from WebTransport
Editor’s Draft, 11 November 2020, and quicktransport directory be archived or deleted from samples?

[jeffposnick]

Now that Chrome 87 is fully rolled out, yes, the existing https://googlechrome.github.io/samples/quictransport/client.html needs to be rewritten to account for the WebTransport changes.

In the meantime, referring to the samples from the WebTransport Editor's Draft is the best course forward. I am hesitant to redeploy anything rewritten until the Editor's Draft has settled a bit, since otherwise we'll always need to catch up to the latest changes.

[jeffposnick]

Thanks for volunteering that contribution, @guest271314!

If you fork this repo, you should be able to create a webtransport directory, and host your sample code there. Then, you could file a pull request against this repo's gh-pages branch, and assuming that's merged, your sample would be deployed.

(I'm personally not up on the latest WebTransport changes, so I might ask @vasilvv and @yutakahirano to help with the PR review.)