Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Picking label sizes for Chrome-facilitated testing #113

Closed
rowan-m opened this issue May 18, 2023 · 7 comments
Closed

Picking label sizes for Chrome-facilitated testing #113

rowan-m opened this issue May 18, 2023 · 7 comments
Assignees
Labels
chrome-testing Chrome-facilitated testing discussions

Comments

@rowan-m
Copy link
Collaborator

rowan-m commented May 18, 2023

Chrome’s testing modes will provide labeled traffic that can be used by ad techs to construct different experiment arms. We want to provide flexibility to ad techs to run multiple experimental conditions or to test at different levels of traffic. What size of labels would be most useful to you in each mode? 1%, .5%, .25%, or something else?

See https://developer.chrome.com/docs/privacy-sandbox/chrome-testing/ for context.

@rowan-m rowan-m added the chrome-testing Chrome-facilitated testing discussions label May 18, 2023
@jdwieland8282
Copy link

Before we get into the size of labels, can you give us an example of how the traffic will be labeled? Where in the oRTB spec will you note the relevant details of the experiment?

@dmdabbs
Copy link

dmdabbs commented May 23, 2023

What size of labels would be most useful to you in each mode?

A single digit grain should be fine.

For consistency Mode A and Mode B should use the same scheme.

It is important that Chrome label each Mode B tranche for some time prior to Chrome's cookie suppression so that everyone can capture before and after measurements.

This cuts across Sandbox features. Will you at some point have a call(s) to discuss and align, or were you thinkling of covering this in say the biweekly PAAPI (nee FLEDGE) calls?

@rowan-m rowan-m self-assigned this May 23, 2023
@rowan-m
Copy link
Collaborator Author

rowan-m commented May 23, 2023

…can you give us an example of how the traffic will be labeled?

@jdwieland8282 for the first part of your question: via #114 we're considering Client Hints as the mechanism, meaning a specific request header that specifies the mode / experiment for that browser. However, we'd like to get feedback on that issue if that would meet your needs, or if not where you'd expect it to appear.

@rowan-m
Copy link
Collaborator Author

rowan-m commented May 23, 2023

This cuts across Sandbox features. Will you at some point have a call(s) to discuss and align, or were you thinkling of covering this in say the biweekly PAAPI (nee FLEDGE) calls?

@dmdabbs good request! I think we should certainly plan some explicit office hours sessions and I'll share the comment with the various people running individual calls for their view on where it makes sense to integrate.

@lbdvt
Copy link

lbdvt commented Jun 7, 2023

To have some progressive ramp-up, the first two labels could be for 0.5% of the traffic each, then 1% per label.

@piwanczak
Copy link

Wrt Mode A it would be good to start with something small like 0.1%, and start quick

@clementsimon
Copy link
Collaborator

Closing - please refer to the Chrome-facilitated testing article for the size of label groups.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
chrome-testing Chrome-facilitated testing discussions
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants