Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for BigQuery routines #739

Closed
3 tasks done
erik-carlson opened this issue Nov 23, 2022 · 2 comments
Closed
3 tasks done

Add support for BigQuery routines #739

erik-carlson opened this issue Nov 23, 2022 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@erik-carlson
Copy link

Checklist

  • I did not find a related open enhancement request.
  • I understand that enhancement requests filed in the GitHub repository are by default low priority.
  • If this request is time-sensitive, I have submitted a corresponding issue with GCP support.

Describe the feature or resource

Add config connector support for BigQuery routines to be able to create/manage procedures.

Additional information

Terraform supports routines: https://registry.terraform.io/providers/hashicorp/google/latest/docs/resources/bigquery_routine

Importance

Today we can manage datasets and tables via config connector but then need to have a separate process for managing routines. It would be nice to be able to manage the routines in the same way as other BQ resources.

@erik-carlson erik-carlson added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 23, 2022
@diviner524
Copy link
Collaborator

@erik-carlson

Thank you for your suggestion. BigQuery routines is already in the list of resources we are planning to support. We will let you know when we have more information.

Please reach out to us via Cloud support to prioritize your request if it is a blocker.

@mbzomowski
Copy link

This resource was added in KCC v1.100.0.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants