Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Proposal: support custom index repositories #23

Open
ahmetb opened this issue Aug 6, 2018 · 14 comments
Open

Proposal: support custom index repositories #23

ahmetb opened this issue Aug 6, 2018 · 14 comments
Labels
area/multi-index kind/proposal lifecycle/frozen Indicates that an issue or PR should not be auto-closed due to staleness. priority/backlog Higher priority than priority/awaiting-more-evidence. priority/important-soon Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release.

Comments

@ahmetb
Copy link
Member

ahmetb commented Aug 6, 2018

Krew should support customizable index repositories.

This would allow users to distribute plugins without requiring them to make a pull request to the centralized index repo like "krew-index".

Similarly, this would allow vendors to distribute their plugins that are too specific or one-off to be in the centralized index repo.

Work here is probably:

  • Determine/propose a user experience journey
  • Propose a design
  • Implement CLI commands to tap/untap into other index repos
  • Refactor update/upgrade paths to keep taps in mind
  • Write user/developer documentation on working with custom repos.

@lbb has showed interest to work on this.

@ahmetb
Copy link
Member Author

ahmetb commented Dec 10, 2018

There's a design at https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fG3ST0QbadQGcxNiFAZ9GhX_RZ8pm3piT99UK3FbT88/edit?ts=5b75a2a6 if anyone wants to review.

@ahmetb
Copy link
Member Author

ahmetb commented Dec 12, 2018

/cc @juanvallejo @soltysh

@melaniecebula
Copy link

@ahmetb @juanvallejo @soltysh any update on this issue? any way to help? I'm excited to try this out for Airbnb but support for custom index repositories is likely a requirement for us.

@juanvallejo
Copy link

@melaniecebula I've started a draft here to begin gathering thoughts on how to begin implementing this. Feel free to contribute or leave feedback on there

@ahmetb
Copy link
Member Author

ahmetb commented Feb 5, 2019

@juanvallejo the link is not available for public access

@ahmetb ahmetb changed the title Support custom index repositories Proposal: support custom index repositories Feb 5, 2019
@juanvallejo
Copy link

@ahmetb Here's a clone of that document with public access: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ofz884w9pQo4d1aolgPdYdLWSi1H5mtisoKAgmTW2kg/edit?usp=sharing (not sure I'm able to make original doc publicly accessible with that account)

@nulltrope
Copy link

hey, wondering what the next steps are for pushing this forward?

we've been writing many kubectl plugins internally which are specific to our stack, and being able to distribute them with krew would be a huge improvement over the manual process we use now.

@fejta-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jul 16, 2019
@ahmetb
Copy link
Member Author

ahmetb commented Jul 16, 2019

/remove-lifecycle stale
/priority important-soon
/priority backlog

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added priority/important-soon Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release. priority/backlog Higher priority than priority/awaiting-more-evidence. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Jul 16, 2019
@fejta-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Oct 14, 2019
@corneliusweig
Copy link
Contributor

/remove-lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Oct 14, 2019
@fejta-bot

This comment has been minimized.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jan 12, 2020
@ahmetb
Copy link
Member Author

ahmetb commented Jan 14, 2020

/lifecycle frozen

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jan 14, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/frozen Indicates that an issue or PR should not be auto-closed due to staleness. label Jan 14, 2020
@ahmetb
Copy link
Member Author

ahmetb commented Feb 20, 2020

We are moving ahead with the concrete proposal at #483.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/multi-index kind/proposal lifecycle/frozen Indicates that an issue or PR should not be auto-closed due to staleness. priority/backlog Higher priority than priority/awaiting-more-evidence. priority/important-soon Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants