You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi! Thank you for such readable code - I had one question wrt the training process.
In Line 322, and Line 327 of train_util.py (the forward backward function), you select 2 sets of time-steps one with t =0, and one with t sampled from the diffusion steps. You also correctly associate both of these to the clean image and noisy image respectively.
My qs is : Why are you using 2 separate sets of images (a clean set, and noisy set), and concatenating them to train the classifier on the batch?
Thanks in advance!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks for your interest in our work. We use the clean set for a better classification performance, since the noisy set contribute less to the clean classification performance.
i.e., the score is related to epsilon with a scaling factor of $\sqrt{1 - \bar{\alpha}_t}$.
When you create the denoising training loss (i.e. fisher divergence, in Algorithm 1 in the paper, you add the score from $\epsilon$. I was wondering, would we not have to multiply score by the scaling factor and then get the MSE ?
Hi! Thank you for such readable code - I had one question wrt the training process.
In Line 322, and Line 327 of train_util.py (the forward backward function), you select 2 sets of time-steps one with t =0, and one with t sampled from the diffusion steps. You also correctly associate both of these to the clean image and noisy image respectively.
My qs is : Why are you using 2 separate sets of images (a clean set, and noisy set), and concatenating them to train the classifier on the batch?
Thanks in advance!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: