Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on May 23, 2023. It is now read-only.

[Feature]: Sensitive information rule configuration #188

Closed
8 tasks done
Bidaya0 opened this issue Nov 10, 2021 · 0 comments · Fixed by #220 or #289
Closed
8 tasks done

[Feature]: Sensitive information rule configuration #188

Bidaya0 opened this issue Nov 10, 2021 · 0 comments · Fixed by #220 or #289
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@Bidaya0
Copy link
Collaborator

Bidaya0 commented Nov 10, 2021

Preflight Checklist

  • I agree to follow the Code of Conduct that this project adheres to.
  • I have searched the issue tracker for an issue that matches the one I want to file, without success.

Problem Description

  • Sensitive information rule configuration

Proposed Solution

  • Add API for obtaining sensitive information rule list
  • Added new sensitive information rule API
  • Add sensitive information rule status modification API
  • Add sensitive information rule editing API
  • Add sensitive information rule deleted API
  • Add sensitive information pattern type list API

Noted:

  • When policy created, the corresponding sensitive information type are automatically created
  • When modifying the name, modify the corresponding type at the same time
  • When creating a rule, at the same time check whether the rule conforms to the type it belongs to, for example, check whether the regex conforms to REGEX POSIX 1003.2
  • When deleting a rule, only the status bit of the rule is modified without actually deleting the data

Alternatives Considered

Additional Information

No response

@Bidaya0 Bidaya0 assigned exexute and Bidaya0 and unassigned exexute Nov 10, 2021
@Bidaya0 Bidaya0 linked a pull request Nov 19, 2021 that will close this issue
@Bidaya0 Bidaya0 linked a pull request Dec 3, 2021 that will close this issue
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants