Published.bib

@article{zhang_malleability_2021,
	title = {The malleability of attentional capture},
	volume = {29},
	issn = {1350-6285, 1464-0716},
	url = {https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13506285.2021.1915903},
	doi = {10.1080/13506285.2021.1915903},
	abstract = {We suggest that consideration of trial-by-trial variations, individual differences, and training data will enrich the current framework in Luck, S. J., Gaspelin, N., Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., \& Theeuwes, J. (2020. Progress toward resolving the attentional capture debate. Visual Cognition, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2020.1848949). We consider whether attentional capture is modulated by trial-by-trial fluctuations of attentional state and experiences on the previous trial. We also consider whether individual differences may affect attentional capture while highlighting potential challenges in using the colour-singleton task to measure individual differences. Finally, performance in the colour-singleton task can be modified dramatically with practice but the underlying mechanisms are not entirely clear. Understanding the malleability of attentional capture may broaden the current framework and resolve outstanding questions.},
	pages = {571--574},
	number = {9},
	journaltitle = {Visual Cognition},
	shortjournal = {Visual Cognition},
	author = {Zhang, Han and Abagis, Tessa R. and Jonides, John},
	urldate = {2021-10-27},
	date = {2021-10-21},
	langid = {english},
	file = {Zhang et al. - 2021 - The malleability of attentional capture.pdf:/Users/HanZhang/Zotero/storage/4WW4ADRE/Zhang et al. - 2021 - The malleability of attentional capture.pdf:application/pdf},
}

@article{zhang_wandering_2020,
	title = {Wandering eyes: Eye movements during mind wandering in video lectures},
	volume = {34},
	doi = {10.1002/acp.3632},
	pages = {449--464},
	number = {2},
	journaltitle = {Applied Cognitive Psychology},
	author = {Zhang, Han and Miller, Kevin F and Sun, Xin and Cortina, Kai S},
	date = {2020},
}

@article{zhang_how_2018,
	title = {How listening to music affects reading: Evidence from eye tracking},
	volume = {44},
	issn = {1939-1285, 0278-7393},
	url = {http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/xlm0000544},
	doi = {10.1037/xlm0000544},
	shorttitle = {How listening to music affects reading},
	pages = {1778--1791},
	number = {11},
	journaltitle = {Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition},
	author = {Zhang, Han and Miller, Kevin F. and Cleveland, Raymond and Cortina, Kai S.},
	date = {2018},
	file = {Zhang et al. - 2018 - How listening to music affects reading Evidence f.pdf:/Users/HanZhang/Zotero/storage/HDXF3ZZP/Zhang et al. - 2018 - How listening to music affects reading Evidence f.pdf:application/pdf},
}

@article{zhang_missing_2020,
	title = {Missing the joke: Reduced rereading of garden-path jokes during mind-wandering},
	volume = {46},
	issn = {0278-7393},
	doi = {10.1037/xlm0000745},
	shorttitle = {Missing the joke},
	pages = {638--648},
	number = {4},
	journaltitle = {Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition},
	shortjournal = {Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition},
	author = {Zhang, Han and Qu, Chuyan and Miller, Kevin F. and Cortina, Kai S.},
	date = {2020},
	keywords = {Eye Movements, Reading, Semantics, Daydreaming, Mind Wandering, mind-wandering, eye movements, reading, humor, Jokes, Mind, Reading Comprehension, Tobacco Smoking},
	file = {Zhang et al. - 2020 - Missing the joke Reduced rereading of garden-path.pdf:/Users/HanZhang/Zotero/storage/MK9JCMPN/Zhang et al. - 2020 - Missing the joke Reduced rereading of garden-path.pdf:application/pdf},
}

@article{osborne_association_2023,
	title = {The association between different sources of distraction and symptoms of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder},
	volume = {14},
	issn = {1664-0640},
	doi = {10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1173989},
	abstract = {{IntroductionAdults} with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder ({ADHD}) are generally distractible. Yet, the precise relationship between {ADHD} and distractibility remains under-specified in two respects. First, different sources of distraction, such as background noise or mind wandering, may not be equally associated with {ADHD}. Second, {ADHD} itself comprises a variety of symptoms that show considerable heterogeneity and it is unclear which {ADHD} symptoms are associated with which type of distraction.{MethodsThe} current study addresses these questions using one clinically evaluated sample (N = 69) and two large non-clinically evaluated samples (N = 569, N = 651). In all samples, participants completed questionnaires about their susceptibility to external distraction, unwanted intrusive thoughts, spontaneous mind-wandering and {ADHD} symptomatology.{ResultsTraditional} regression and novel network analyses revealed an overwhelming contribution of spontaneous mind-wandering in explaining {ADHD} symptoms, although external distraction and unwanted intrusive thoughts were also associated with a small number of {ADHD} symptoms.{DiscussionFindings} support a growing body of literature linking spontaneous mind-wandering and {ADHD}, and they highlight the heterogeneity in the association between {ADHD} symptoms and different sources of distraction.},
	journaltitle = {Frontiers in Psychiatry},
	author = {Osborne, Jahla B. and Zhang, Han and Carlson, Madison and Shah, Priti and Jonides, John},
	urldate = {2023-07-27},
	date = {2023},
	file = {Full Text PDF:/Users/HanZhang/Zotero/storage/HJ43RMYP/Osborne et al. - 2023 - The association between different sources of distr.pdf:application/pdf},
}

@article{fansher_icon_2022,
	title = {Icon arrays reduce concern over {COVID}-19 vaccine side effects: a randomized control study},
	volume = {7},
	issn = {2365-7464},
	url = {https://cognitiveresearchjournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s41235-022-00387-5},
	doi = {10.1186/s41235-022-00387-5},
	shorttitle = {Icon arrays reduce concern over {COVID}-19 vaccine side effects},
	abstract = {On April 13, 2021, the {CDC} announced that the administration of Johnson and Johnson’s {COVID}-19 vaccine would be paused due to a rare blood clotting side effect in {\textasciitilde} 0.0001\% of people given the vaccine. Most people who are hesitant to get a {COVID}-19 vaccine list potential side effects as their main concern ({PEW}, 2021); thus, it is likely that this announcement increased vaccine hesitancy among the American public. Two days after the {CDC}’s announcement, we administered a survey to a group of 2,046 Americans to assess their changes in attitudes toward {COVID}19 vaccines. The aim of this study was to investigate whether viewing icon arrays of side effect risk would prevent increases in {COVID}-19 vaccine hesitancy due to the announcement. We found that using icon arrays to illustrate the small chance of experiencing the blood clotting side effect significantly prevented increases in aversion toward the Johnson and Johnson vaccine as well as all other {COVID}-19 vaccines.},
	pages = {38},
	number = {1},
	journaltitle = {Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications},
	shortjournal = {Cogn. Research},
	author = {Fansher, Madison and Adkins, Tyler J. and Lalwani, Poortata and Boduroglu, Aysecan and Carlson, Madison and Quirk, Madelyn and Lewis, Richard L. and Shah, Priti and Zhang, Han and Jonides, John},
	urldate = {2023-07-28},
	date = {2022-12},
	langid = {english},
	file = {Fansher et al. - 2022 - Icon arrays reduce concern over COVID-19 vaccine s.pdf:/Users/HanZhang/Zotero/storage/UTJEA2Z4/Fansher et al. - 2022 - Icon arrays reduce concern over COVID-19 vaccine s.pdf:application/pdf},
}

@article{zhang_d_2023,
	title = {A d factor? Understanding trait distractibility and its relationships with {ADHD} symptomatology and hyperfocus},
	volume = {18},
	issn = {1932-6203},
	url = {https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0292215},
	doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0292215},
	shorttitle = {A d factor?},
	abstract = {People differ substantially in their vulnerability to distraction. Yet, many types of distractions exist, from external stimulation to internal thoughts. How should we characterize individual differences in their distractibility? Two samples of adult participants (total N = 1220) completed a large battery of questionnaires assessing different facets of real-world distractibility. Latent modeling revealed that these measures could be explained by three correlated-yet-distinct factors: external distraction, unwanted intrusive thoughts, and mind-wandering. Importantly, about 80\% of the total variance in these three factors could be explained by a single higher-order factor (d) that could be construed in terms of a person’s general distractibility, and this general distractibility model was replicated across the two samples. We then applied the general distractibility model to understand the nature of {ADHD} symptomatology and hyperfocus (an intense state of long-lasting and highly focused attention). d was substantially associated with self-reported {ADHD} symptoms. Interestingly, d was also positively associated with hyperfocus, suggesting that hyperfocus may, to some degree, reflect attention problems. These results also show marked consistencies across the two samples. Overall, the study provides an important step toward a comprehensive understanding of individual differences in distractibility and related constructs.},
	pages = {e0292215},
	number = {10},
	journaltitle = {{PLOS} {ONE}},
	shortjournal = {{PLOS} {ONE}},
	author = {Zhang, Han and Miyake, Akira and Osborne, Jahla and Shah, Priti and Jonides, John},
	urldate = {2023-10-25},
	date = {2023-10-25},
	langid = {english},
	note = {Publisher: Public Library of Science},
	keywords = {Attention, Psychometrics, {ADHD}, Sensory perception, Behavior, Factor analysis, Questionnaires, Lectures},
	file = {Full Text PDF:/Users/HanZhang/Zotero/storage/XYNUUJZ8/Zhang et al. - 2023 - A d factor Understanding trait distractibility an.pdf:application/pdf},
}

@article{zhang_lingering_2024,
	title = {Lingering on Distraction: Examining Distractor Rejection in Adults with {ADHD}},
	volume = {In press},
	doi = {10.1080/13506285.2024.2328379},
	journaltitle = {Visual Cognition},
	author = {Zhang, Han and Abagis, Tessa R. and Steeby, Clara J and Jonides, John},
	date = {2024},
	note = {status: in press},
}

@article{zhang_how_2024,
	title = {How Does Mind-Wandering Affect Distractor Suppression?},
	volume = {In press},
	doi = {10.1080/13506285.2024.2347605},
	journaltitle = {Visual Cognition},
	author = {Zhang, Han and Miller, Kevin F. and Jonides, John},
	date = {2024},
	note = {Status: in press},
}

@article{zhang_scene_2022,
	title = {Scene meaningfulness guides eye movements even during mind-wandering},
	volume = {84},
	issn = {1943-393X},
	abstract = {During scene viewing, semantic information in the scene has been shown to play a dominant role in guiding fixations compared to visual salience (e.g., Henderson \& Hayes, 2017). However, scene viewing is sometimes disrupted by cognitive processes unrelated to the scene. For example, viewers sometimes engage in mind-wandering, or having thoughts unrelated to the current task. How do meaning and visual salience account for fixation allocation when the viewer is mind-wandering, and does it differ from when the viewer is on-task? We asked participants to study a series of real-world scenes in preparation for a later memory test. Thought probes occasionally occurred after a subset of scenes to assess whether participants were on-task or mind-wandering. We used salience maps (Graph-Based Visual Saliency; Harel, Koch, \& Perona, 2007) and meaning maps (Henderson \& Hayes, 2017) to represent the distribution of visual salience and semantic richness in the scene, respectively. Because visual salience and meaning were represented similarly, we could directly compare how well they predicted fixation allocation. Our results indicate that fixations prioritized meaningful over visually salient regions in the scene during mind-wandering just as during attentive viewing. These results held across the entire viewing time. A re-analysis of an independent study (Krasich, Huffman, Faber, \& Brockmole Journal of Vision, 20(9), 10, 2020) showed similar results. Therefore, viewers appear to prioritize meaningful regions over visually salient regions in real-world scenes even during mind-wandering.},
	pages = {1130--1150},
	number = {4},
	journaltitle = {Attention, Perception, \& Psychophysics},
	shortjournal = {Atten Percept Psychophys},
	author = {Zhang, Han and Anderson, Nicola C. and Miller, Kevin F.},
	urldate = {2024-05-01},
	date = {2022-05-01},
	langid = {english},
	keywords = {Attention, Eye-tracking, Mind-wandering, Scene perception},
	file = {Zhang et al. - 2022 - Scene meaningfulness guides eye movements even dur.pdf:/Users/HanZhang/Zotero/storage/SCD3YJQ8/Zhang et al. - 2022 - Scene meaningfulness guides eye movements even dur.pdf:application/pdf},
}

@article{zhang_refixation_2021,
	title = {Refixation patterns of mind-wandering during real-world scene perception},
	volume = {47},
	issn = {1939-1277},
	doi = {10.1037/xhp0000877},
	abstract = {Recent studies have shown that mind-wandering ({MW}) is associated with changes in eye movement parameters, but have not explored how {MW} affects the sequential pattern of eye movements involved in making sense of complex visual information. Eye movements naturally unfold over time and this process may reveal novel information about cognitive processing during {MW}. The current study used Recurrence Quantification Analysis (Anderson, Bischof, Laidlaw, Risko, \& Kingstone, 2013) to describe the pattern of refixations (fixations directed to previously inspected regions) during {MW}. Participants completed a real-world scene encoding task and responded to thought probes assessing intentional and unintentional {MW}. Both types of {MW} were associated with worse memory of the scenes. More important, {RQA} showed that scanpaths during unintentional {MW} were more repetitive than during on-task episodes, as indicated by a higher recurrence rate and more stereotypical fixation sequences. This increased repetitiveness suggests an adaptive response to processing failures through reexamining previous locations. Moreover, this increased repetitiveness contributed to fixations focusing on a smaller spatial scale of the stimuli. Finally, we were also able to validate several traditional measures: both intentional and unintentional {MW} were associated with fewer and longer fixations; eye-blinking increased numerically during both types of {MW} but the difference was only significant for unintentional {MW}. Overall, the results advanced our understanding of how visual processing is affected during {MW} by highlighting the sequential aspect of eye movements. ({PsycInfo} Database Record (c) 2020 {APA}, all rights reserved)},
	pages = {36--52},
	number = {1},
	journaltitle = {Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance},
	author = {Zhang, Han and Anderson, Nicola C. and Miller, Kevin F.},
	date = {2021},
	note = {Place: {US}
Publisher: American Psychological Association},
	keywords = {Eye Fixation, Eye Movements, Human Information Storage, Intention, Mind Wandering, Visual Displays, Visual Perception},
}