Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Videobox support #1

Closed
cmirnow opened this issue Apr 6, 2016 · 4 comments
Closed

Videobox support #1

cmirnow opened this issue Apr 6, 2016 · 4 comments

Comments

@cmirnow
Copy link

cmirnow commented Apr 6, 2016

Hello. Tell please, how I can make YouTube Video gallery of the 5 version Videobox ? The old format don't work:

{videobox}5AG4pQPdZoE|,ATod-zbwMDE|,BqHTJfxBRww|,S9M3WaZSTBk|,eVoGpaCz8KE|,EPhTFLJiuYQ|,nHrMsr9spRk|,gt782I7ngUc{/videobox}

@HitkoDev
Copy link
Owner

HitkoDev commented Apr 7, 2016

I've tested the code above on Joomla! 3.5 running Videobox 5.0.0 beta-2 and it seems to work fine. Please check that both System - Videobox and Videobox - YouTube plugins are enabled, since Joomla! doesn't auto-enable plugins upon installation. If that doesn't solve the problem, open the System - Videobox plugin and click Save, in case the plugin settings haven't been properly saved upon installation.

@cmirnow
Copy link
Author

cmirnow commented Apr 7, 2016

Many thanks!
"open the System - Videobox plugin and click Save" - It works.
Otherwise, we get "Invalid image geometry" on the page.
Another question, if I may. In FF scrolling of slider does not work smoothly - http://melodicpictures.ru/video. Your opinion?

[aleksej@localhost ~]$ LC_ALL=C dnf info firefox
Last metadata expiration check: 25 days, 0:49:24 ago on Sun Mar 13 18:01:56 2016.
Installed Packages
Name        : firefox
Arch        : x86_64
Epoch       : 0
Version     : 45.0.1
Release     : 2.fc23
Size        : 128 M
Repo        : @System
From repo   : updates
Summary     : Mozilla Firefox Web browser

@HitkoDev
Copy link
Owner

HitkoDev commented Apr 7, 2016

Web animations standard isn't supported in all browsers yet, which is why these browsers use a JavaScript polyfill that doesn't work as smooth. However, browsers that do support Web animations have a native implementation for it, which is much more optimised and utilises hardware acceleration, which is why I prefer it over jQuery or older JavaScript animations.

@HitkoDev HitkoDev closed this as completed Apr 7, 2016
@HitkoDev
Copy link
Owner

HitkoDev commented Apr 7, 2016

I've removed your question and opened a new issue. In future please don't post unrelated problems under the same issue.

@HitkoDev HitkoDev mentioned this issue Apr 11, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants