mit-scheme failed to build on 10.10

[lucamot]

mit-scheme fails to build on 10.10, using either Xcode 5 or Xcode 6 (beta 6 at the time of writing):

Xcode 5:
https://gist.github.com/ef4b4fc67fc9eff91203

Xcode 6:
https://gist.github.com/6c1d7852dd0630760128

Thanks!

[jacknagel]

Your Xcode 6 gist claims otherwise:

configure: error: No MacOSX SDK for version: 10.10
configure: error: ./configure failed for microcode

HOMEBREW_VERSION: 0.9.5
HEAD: f994c6db584c48cdfe105123a17b1033ae67ca91
CPU: 8-core 64-bit ivybridge
OS X: 10.10-x86_64
Xcode: 5.1.1
CLT: 6.0.0.0.1.1409104523
X11: 2.7.7 => /opt/X11

Make sure you run xcode-select -switch and point it at the newer Xcode.

[lucamot]

True, but the strange thing is that the config.out (from the same gist) shows Xcode 6 as expected...

HOMEBREW_VERSION: 0.9.5
ORIGIN: https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew
HEAD: f994c6db584c48cdfe105123a17b1033ae67ca91
HOMEBREW_PREFIX: /usr/local
HOMEBREW_CELLAR: /usr/local/Cellar
CPU: 8-core 64-bit ivybridge
OS X: 10.10-x86_64
Xcode: 6.0 => /Applications/Xcode6-Beta6.app/Contents/Developer
CLT: 6.0.0.0.1.1409104523
Clang: 6.0 build 600
X11: 2.7.7 => /opt/X11
System Ruby: 2.0.0-481
Perl: /usr/bin/perl
Python: /usr/bin/python
Ruby: /usr/bin/ruby

Any hint on this? xcode-select -p also reports the correct Xcode version:

$ xcode-select -p
/Applications/Xcode6-Beta6.app/Contents/Developer

[DomT4]

Your Xcode is out of date by 1 beta version. We're on B7 now.

Still, I can replicate this on 10.10. Gist here.

[jacknagel]

The config.log that we really need to see is in the src/microcode directory. Can someone brew install mit-scheme -d, choose "shell", and gist that file?

[DomT4]

@jacknagel Here you go.

[jacknagel]

The configure script hardcodes /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Platforms/MacOSX.platform/Developer/SDKs as the location of the SDK, so I think this will resolve itself when Xcode 6 final is released.

[DomT4]

Thanks. I've thrown it on the 'broken for 10.10' list with a link back here.

[jacknagel]

Maybe, I wouldn't really recommend it though.

[jacknagel]

Closing in favor of #29988

[DomT4]

Yeah. I don't like screwing with Apple's paths. Just throwing around the idea really.

[pagibson]

If anybody comes here looking for an interim solution to this problem, creating a soft link from /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Platforms/MacOSX.platform/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.10.sdk to MacOSX9.10.sdk doesn't seem to create any issues and should allow the install to take place without a hitch.

[DomT4]

This should be fixed now. The latest Xcode (6.1 Beta 3) is no longer tagged with the -Beta name, so Xcode.app will resolve to the correct path.