archey is a GitHub fork #47167
Comments
@obihann You've been active in this formula, and that's your repo at the head of the fork chain. Comments? |
I don't have any issue with pointing at the fork in this situation FWIW. It's where most people seem to go to find an Archey OS X clone that works now. |
Okay. Is there something we can do to suppress the audit failure? |
Could add a formula specific |
Is their anything I can do on my end to help out here? |
If you really wanted to fix this, you could de-forkify your repo. (I think that requires renaming the existing repo, creating a new one with the original name, and pushing your history to it from a local clone.) Or you can just wait for us to figure out how to do audit whitelisting. It's not urgent: I just ran in to this while testing & auditing some stuff; no functionality is broken. |
You can just ask GitHub to defork this, actually (and as I work there: I can do this for you).
@apjanke We already do that; you can see in other cases we do early returns based on the formula name. |
@MikeMcQuaid If you could defork my branch, that would be amazing. Thanks! |
https://github.com/obihann/archey-osx is now deforked. Thanks @apjanke and @obihann! |
The
archey
formula points to a GitHub fork.It's not clear what the actual master repository should be, because this is a 5-deep fork chain that goes back to a half-empty repo (maybe just used to share a copy of a script?). Let's figure this out and see find what the actual master repo is.
Formula points to https://github.com/obihann/archey-osx.
Fork chain:
https://github.com/obihann/archey-osx
forked from https://github.com/Gary00/OSXey
forked from https://github.com/joshfinnie/archey-osx
forked from https://github.com/teoljungberg/archey-osx
forked from https://github.com/onlythefinestwilldo/Quality.Junk
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: