You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I think there is a strange behavior in case some entries have missing fields. That is, suppose that entries number 1 and 4 have abstract field, but in entries 2 and 3 it's missing. In that case abstract field is added to entries 2 and 3 and it's value is copied from the first entry.
I've noticed that behavior for abstract, comment and x-color fields, but I guess it may be true for other fields too.
Here is a minimal example:
@article{ashfahani_2019_continual_DL,
abstract = { The feasibility of deep neural networks (DNNs) to address
data stream problems still requires intensive study because of
the static and offline nature of conventional deep learning
approaches. A deep continual learning algorithm, namely
autonomous deep learning (ADL), is proposed in this paper.
Unlike traditional deep learning methods, ADL features a
flexible structure where its network structure can be
constructed from scratch with the absence of an initial
network structure via the self-constructing network structure.
ADL specifically addresses catastrophic forgetting by having a
different-depth structure which is capable of achieving a
trade-off between plasticity and stability. Network
significance (NS) formula is proposed to drive the hidden
nodes growing and pruning mechanism. Drift detection scenario
(DDS) is put forward to signal distributional changes in data
streams which induce the creation of a new hidden layer. The
maximum information compression index (MICI) method plays an
important role as a complexity reduction module eliminating
redundant layers. The efficacy of ADL is numerically validated
under the prequential test-then-train procedure in lifelong
environments using nine popular data stream problems. The
numerical results demonstrate that ADL consistently
outperforms recent continual learning methods while
characterizing the automatic construction of network
structures. },
archiveprefix = {arXiv},
author = {Andri Ashfahani and Mahardhika Pratama},
comment = {published = 2018-10-17T01:40:45Z, updated = 2020-01-09T12:19:19Z},
doi = {10.1137/1.9781611975673.75},
eprint = {1810.07348v4},
month = jan,
primaryclass = {cs.LG},
title = {Autonomous Deep Learning: Continual Learning Approach for Dynamic Environments},
url = {http://arxiv.org/abs/1810.07348v4; http://arxiv.org/pdf/1810.07348v4},
x-color = {#cc3300},
x-fetchedfrom = {arXiv.org},
year = 2019
}
@article{ashfahani_2020_DEVDAN,
added-at = {2020-05-08T00:00:00.000+0200},
author = {Andri Ashfahani and Mahardhika Pratama and Edwin Lughofer and Yew-Soon Ong},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2f01e837afa1ecc4df48befc53e43f458/dblp},
ee = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2019.07.106},
interhash = {d8ce7807e54d80e379324b2c3b4cd6df},
intrahash = {f01e837afa1ecc4df48befc53e43f458},
journal = {Neurocomputing},
pages = {297--314},
timestamp = {2020-05-09T11:39:11.000+0200},
title = {DEVDAN: Deep evolving denoising autoencoder.},
url = {http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/journals/ijon/ijon390.html#AshfahaniPLO20},
volume = 390,
x-fetchedfrom = {Bibsonomy},
year = 2020
}
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I think there is a strange behavior in case some entries have missing fields. That is, suppose that entries number 1 and 4 have
abstract
field, but in entries 2 and 3 it's missing. In that caseabstract
field is added to entries 2 and 3 and it's value is copied from the first entry.I've noticed that behavior for
abstract
,comment
andx-color
fields, but I guess it may be true for other fields too.Here is a minimal example:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: