Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Document that composite strategies need to work reliably on non-random inputs #2466

Closed
Zalathar opened this issue Jun 16, 2020 · 0 comments
Closed

Document that composite strategies need to work reliably on non-random inputs #2466

Zalathar opened this issue Jun 16, 2020 · 0 comments
Labels
docs documentation could *always* be better

Comments

@Zalathar
Copy link
Contributor

While investigating #2464, I noticed that the main documentation for @composite doesn't explicitly mention that composite strategies need to work reliably even when the values they draw are non-random.

Failing to do so will cause problems for shrinking, and will also tend to issue “smallest example is extremely large” health warnings.
@Zalathar Zalathar added the docs documentation could *always* be better label Jun 16, 2020
@Zac-HD Zac-HD mentioned this issue Jul 25, 2020
Closed
@Zac-HD Zac-HD closed this as completed in 9d1e7d5 Aug 12, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
docs documentation could *always* be better
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@Zalathar