Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

FetchResourcePayloadsDAO hits an error condition under debug without _since parameter #2391

Closed
prb112 opened this issue May 19, 2021 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@prb112
Copy link
Contributor

prb112 commented May 19, 2021

Describe the bug
FetchResourcePayloadsDAO hits an error condition under debug without _since parameter

[5/19/21, 19:43:47:460 UTC] 0000005e com.ibm.fhir.persistence.jdbc.impl.FHIRPersistenceJDBCImpl   E Unexpected error while processing token value records.
java.lang.NullPointerException
    at java.sql.Timestamp.from(Timestamp.java:545)
    at com.ibm.fhir.persistence.jdbc.dao.impl.FetchResourcePayloadsDAO.count(FetchResourcePayloadsDAO.java:184)
    at com.ibm.fhir.persistence.jdbc.impl.FHIRPersistenceJDBCImpl.fetchResourcePayloads(FHIRPersistenceJDBCImpl.java:2652)
    at com.ibm.fhir.bulkdata.jbatch.export.fast.ResourcePayloadReader.readItem(ResourcePayloadReader.java:307)
    at com.ibm.jbatch.container.artifact.proxy.ItemReaderProxy.readItem(ItemReaderProxy.java:77)
    at com.ibm.jbatch.container.controller.impl.ChunkStepControllerImpl.readItem(ChunkStepControllerImpl.java:329)
    at com.ibm.jbatch.container.controller.impl.ChunkStepControllerImpl.readAndProcess(ChunkStepControllerImpl.java:245)
    at com.ibm.jbatch.container.controller.impl.ChunkStepControllerImpl.invokeChunk(ChunkStepControllerImpl.java:626)
    at com.ibm.jbatch.container.controller.impl.ChunkStepControllerImpl.invokeCoreStep(ChunkStepControllerImpl.java:795)
    at com.ibm.jbatch.container.controller.impl.BaseStepControllerImpl.execute(BaseStepControllerImpl.java:295)
    at com.ibm.jbatch.container.controller.impl.ExecutionTransitioner.doExecutionLoop(ExecutionTransitioner.java:118)
    at com.ibm.jbatch.container.controller.impl.WorkUnitThreadControllerImpl.executeCoreTransitionLoop(WorkUnitThreadControllerImpl.java:96)
    at com.ibm.jbatch.container.controller.impl.WorkUnitThreadControllerImpl.executeWorkUnit(WorkUnitThreadControllerImpl.java:178)
    at com.ibm.jbatch.container.controller.impl.WorkUnitThreadControllerImpl$AbstractControllerHelper.runExecutionOnThread(WorkUnitThreadControllerImpl.java:503)
    at com.ibm.jbatch.container.controller.impl.WorkUnitThreadControllerImpl.runExecutionOnThread(WorkUnitThreadControllerImpl.java:92)
    at com.ibm.jbatch.container.util.BatchWorkUnit.run(BatchWorkUnit.java:113)
    at com.ibm.ws.context.service.serializable.ContextualRunnable.run(ContextualRunnable.java:79)
    at com.ibm.ws.threading.internal.ExecutorServiceImpl$RunnableWrapper.run(ExecutorServiceImpl.java:238)
    at java.base/java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:515)
    at java.base/java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:264)
    at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1128)
    at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:628)
    at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:836)

Environment
Which version of IBM FHIR Server?
4.8.0

To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
Create export using FAST implementation.

Expected behavior
A clear and concise description of what you expected to happen.

Additional context
Add any other context about the problem here.

@prb112 prb112 added the bug Something isn't working label May 19, 2021
@prb112 prb112 self-assigned this May 19, 2021
prb112 added a commit that referenced this issue May 19, 2021
_since parameter #2391

Signed-off-by: Paul Bastide <pbastide@us.ibm.com>
@lmsurpre lmsurpre added this to the Sprint 2021-07 milestone May 19, 2021
prb112 added a commit that referenced this issue May 19, 2021
FetchResourcePayloadsDAO hits an error condition under debug without _since parameter #2391
@d0roppe
Copy link
Collaborator

d0roppe commented May 24, 2021

Ran several tests with "finest" for logging, and did not see any issue with the bulk data commands.

@d0roppe d0roppe closed this as completed May 24, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants