Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

More generic name #2

Open
davux opened this issue Oct 26, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

More generic name #2

davux opened this issue Oct 26, 2021 · 0 comments

Comments

@davux
Copy link

davux commented Oct 26, 2021

It looks like the DID method can be used to resolve DIDs from Fabric, no matter the use case – health passes or other.

Note: Please feel free to close the issue if it is in fact health-specific and I failed to catch it.

I can see a few risks in using a specific name for a generic method:

  • People could copy-paste the specification and rename it with their own DID method, resulting in unnecessary fragmentation and lack of interoperability.
  • People could think the DID method is not fit for them, and turn to other approaches.

For that reason I suggest the DID method be renamed to reflect its generic property, e.g. did:hf or did:fab. What do you think?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant