Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

The definitions, domains and specifications of some datatype properties have to be updated #9

Closed
florenceclavaud opened this issue Oct 2, 2020 · 1 comment
Labels
Aligning RiC-O with RiC-CM v0.2 full draft Types Concerns the Type class system and the properties related to them

Comments

@florenceclavaud
Copy link
Contributor

Same as for #8 for data type properties that correspond to RiC-CM attributes, whenever their definition in RiC-CM has been changed.
With some specific care about:

  • the cases where domains have been changed
  • the cases where RiC-CM now specifies "May be used in a Record Set description when the attribute value is shared by some or all Record members".
    When RiC-O also provides some classes and properties in addition to data type properties (e.g. Type and its subclasses), for representing some RiC-CM attributes, these have to be checked.
@florenceclavaud florenceclavaud added the Types Concerns the Type class system and the properties related to them label Oct 2, 2020
@florenceclavaud florenceclavaud changed the title The definitions, domains and specifications of some data properties have to be updated The definitions, domains and specifications of some datatype properties have to be updated Oct 27, 2020
@florenceclavaud
Copy link
Contributor Author

Done (see pull request #19)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Aligning RiC-O with RiC-CM v0.2 full draft Types Concerns the Type class system and the properties related to them
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant