Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix import (Sourcery refactored) #71

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

sourcery-ai[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot commented Apr 16, 2022

Pull Request #70 refactored by Sourcery.

If you're happy with these changes, merge this Pull Request using the Squash and merge strategy.

NOTE: As code is pushed to the original Pull Request, Sourcery will
re-run and update (force-push) this Pull Request with new refactorings as
necessary. If Sourcery finds no refactorings at any point, this Pull Request
will be closed automatically.

See our documentation here.

Run Sourcery locally

Reduce the feedback loop during development by using the Sourcery editor plugin:

Review changes via command line

To manually merge these changes, make sure you're on the devs branch, then run:

git fetch origin sourcery/devs
git merge --ff-only FETCH_HEAD
git reset HEAD^

Help us improve this pull request!

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot requested a review from UserLazy April 16, 2022 07:11
imported_module = importlib.import_module("zeldris.modules." + module_name)
imported_module = importlib.import_module(f"zeldris.modules.{module_name}")
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Lines 152-152 refactored with the following changes:

Comment on lines -405 to +411
url="t.me/{}?start=ghelp_{}".format(
context.bot.username, module
),
url=f"t.me/{context.bot.username}?start=ghelp_{module}",
)
]
]
),
)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Function get_help refactored with the following changes:

Comment on lines -473 to +478
text="Which module would you like to check {}'s settings for?".format(
chat_name
),
text=f"Which module would you like to check {chat_name}'s settings for?",
reply_markup=InlineKeyboardMarkup(
paginate_modules(0, CHAT_SETTINGS, "stngs", chat=chat_id)
),
)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Function send_settings refactored with the following changes:

Comment on lines -513 to +525
callback_data="stngs_back({})".format(chat_id),
callback_data=f"stngs_back({chat_id})",
)
]
]
),
)


elif prev_match:
chat_id = prev_match.group(1)
curr_page = int(prev_match.group(2))
chat = bot.get_chat(chat_id)
query.message.edit_text(
"Hi there! There are quite a few settings for {} - go ahead and pick what "
"you're interested in.".format(chat.title),
f"Hi there! There are quite a few settings for {chat.title} - go ahead and pick what you're interested in.",
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Function settings_button refactored with the following changes:

Comment on lines -589 to +595
url="t.me/{}?start=stngs_{}".format(
context.bot.username, chat.id
),
url=f"t.me/{context.bot.username}?start=stngs_{chat.id}",
)
]
]
),
)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Function get_settings refactored with the following changes:

@sourcery-ai
Copy link
Contributor Author

sourcery-ai bot commented Apr 16, 2022

Sourcery Code Quality Report

❌  Merging this PR will decrease code quality in the affected files by 0.19%.

Quality metrics Before After Change
Complexity 10.57 🙂 10.57 🙂 0.00
Method Length 116.18 🙂 116.82 🙂 0.64 👎
Working memory 12.15 😞 12.28 😞 0.13 👎
Quality 50.65% 🙂 50.46% 🙂 -0.19% 👎
Other metrics Before After Change
Lines 664 663 -1
Changed files Quality Before Quality After Quality Change
zeldris/main.py 50.65% 🙂 50.46% 🙂 -0.19% 👎

Here are some functions in these files that still need a tune-up:

File Function Complexity Length Working Memory Quality Recommendation
zeldris/main.py start 21 😞 243 ⛔ 18 ⛔ 26.19% 😞 Refactor to reduce nesting. Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions
zeldris/main.py settings_button 7 ⭐ 274 ⛔ 16 ⛔ 38.28% 😞 Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions
zeldris/main.py get_help 7 ⭐ 169 😞 20 ⛔ 41.85% 😞 Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions
zeldris/main.py help_button 5 ⭐ 184 😞 14 😞 48.11% 😞 Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions
zeldris/main.py main 9 🙂 210 ⛔ 10 😞 48.89% 😞 Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions

Legend and Explanation

The emojis denote the absolute quality of the code:

  • ⭐ excellent
  • 🙂 good
  • 😞 poor
  • ⛔ very poor

The 👍 and 👎 indicate whether the quality has improved or gotten worse with this pull request.


Please see our documentation here for details on how these metrics are calculated.

We are actively working on this report - lots more documentation and extra metrics to come!

Help us improve this quality report!

@zYxDevs zYxDevs closed this Apr 16, 2022
@Ryomen-Sukuna Ryomen-Sukuna deleted the sourcery/devs branch April 16, 2022 21:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant