fix(pro:table): width calculation problem after resize

[danranVm]

PR Checklist

Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:

• The commit message follows our guidelines
• Tests for the changes have been added/updated or not needed
• Docs and demo have been added/updated or not needed

What is the current behavior?

• 在表格实际渲染宽度超过了 scroll.width 的时候，每一列都会被放大
  • 例如本身设置的宽度是 80 ，实际渲染成了 200，缩放了 2.5 倍
  • 如果此时通过拖拽拉到了 150px, 经过缩放后实际渲染成了 350px
  • 就会出现用户拖拽缩小宽度，但是反而增大了的宽度的异常情况。

What is the new behavior?

/**
 * 拖拽宽度计算规则
 *
 * * 如果不存在原始的 column.width, 则直接将拖拽后的宽度赋值给 column.width
 * * 如果存在原始的 column.width, 则需要按比例进行计算: (原始宽度 * 拖拽后段都) / 当前真实渲染的宽度
 * * * 同时需要判断是否存在 minWidth, maxWidth，应满足 minWidth < 计算后的宽度 < maxWidth
 */

Other information

[idux-bot]

This preview will be available after the AzureCI is passed.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #1417 (6938a84) into main (5d604f9) will decrease coverage by 0.09%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1417      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   92.90%   92.80%   -0.10%     
==========================================
  Files         325      327       +2     
  Lines       29930    30288     +358     
  Branches     2495     2541      +46     
==========================================
+ Hits        27805    28110     +305     
- Misses       2125     2178      +53     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
packages/pro/transfer/src/token.ts	100.00% <0.00%> (ø)
packages/pro/transfer/src/types.ts	100.00% <0.00%> (ø)
packages/components/cascader/src/token.ts	100.00% <0.00%> (ø)
packages/components/cascader/src/types.ts	100.00% <0.00%> (ø)
packages/pro/transfer/src/utils.ts
packages/cdk/utils/src/tree.ts	98.40% <0.00%> (ø)
packages/components/utils/src/useDisabled.ts	100.00% <0.00%> (ø)
.../components/utils/src/useTreeCheckStateResolver.ts	74.82% <0.00%> (ø)
packages/components/cascader/src/Cascader.tsx	96.07% <0.00%> (+0.20%)	⬆️

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.