Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

BasicAudit IG #144

Open
JohnMoehrke opened this issue Mar 16, 2021 · 4 comments
Open

BasicAudit IG #144

JohnMoehrke opened this issue Mar 16, 2021 · 4 comments
Labels
Dev-M Development effort is Medium Review-L Committee Review effort is Large Testing-M Testing Plan Development is Medium
Projects
ITI Project Planning

Comments

@JohnMoehrke
Copy link
Contributor

Given ATNA has FHIR feed and query
And FHIR REST activities cause ATNA audit events
When a FHIR REST activity occurs
And the Client or Server declares support for this IG
Then a AuditEvent is recorded following the this IG profile
And an audit-query will find AuditEvent records following this IG
@JohnMoehrke JohnMoehrke created this issue from a note in ITI Project Planning (Planning Assessed Work Items) Mar 16, 2021
@JohnMoehrke JohnMoehrke added Dev-M Development effort is Medium Review-L Committee Review effort is Large Testing-M Testing Plan Development is Medium labels Mar 16, 2021
@JohnMoehrke JohnMoehrke self-assigned this Mar 16, 2021
@JohnMoehrke
Copy link
Contributor Author

Might look like this http://build.fhir.org/ig/JohnMoehrke/BasicAudit/branches/main/index.html

@JohnMoehrke
Copy link
Contributor Author

note, that this IG would set a pattern for the other RESTful profiles in IHE (PDQm, PMIR, SVCM, etc). This work item does not include in scope the updating of those other RESTful profiles. This work item might influence them when they move to IG.

@JohnMoehrke
Copy link
Contributor Author

note this is a content profile, presuming ATNA transactions. ATNA transaction IG would be an independent work item.

@JohnMoehrke
Copy link
Contributor Author

assessed by planning as higher priority than Federation of MHDS

@JohnMoehrke JohnMoehrke moved this from Planning Assessed Work Items to In development by Tech in ITI Project Planning Oct 20, 2021
@JohnMoehrke JohnMoehrke moved this from In development by Tech to Public Comment in ITI Project Planning Feb 17, 2022
@JohnMoehrke JohnMoehrke moved this from Public Comment to In development by Tech in ITI Project Planning Feb 17, 2022
@JohnMoehrke JohnMoehrke moved this from In development by Tech to Public Comment in ITI Project Planning Feb 17, 2022
@JohnMoehrke JohnMoehrke moved this from Public Comment to In development by Tech in ITI Project Planning Feb 17, 2022
@JohnMoehrke JohnMoehrke moved this from In development by Tech to Public Comment in ITI Project Planning Feb 17, 2022
@JohnMoehrke JohnMoehrke changed the title ATNA sub-IG for FHIR REST events BasicAudit IG Feb 18, 2022
@JohnMoehrke JohnMoehrke moved this from Public Comment to In development by Tech in ITI Project Planning Apr 25, 2022
@JohnMoehrke JohnMoehrke moved this from In development by Tech to Public Comment in ITI Project Planning Apr 27, 2022
@JohnMoehrke JohnMoehrke moved this from Public Comment to In development by Tech in ITI Project Planning Apr 28, 2022
@JohnMoehrke JohnMoehrke moved this from In development by Tech to In Trial Implementation in ITI Project Planning Apr 28, 2022
@JohnMoehrke JohnMoehrke moved this from In Trial Implementation to In development by Tech in ITI Project Planning Apr 28, 2022
@JohnMoehrke JohnMoehrke moved this from In development by Tech to In Trial Implementation in ITI Project Planning Apr 29, 2022
@JohnMoehrke JohnMoehrke removed their assignment May 19, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Dev-M Development effort is Medium Review-L Committee Review effort is Large Testing-M Testing Plan Development is Medium
Projects
ITI Project Planning
  
Published (e.g. Trial Implementation)
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@JohnMoehrke