Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Version ambiguity #29

Closed
rwynne opened this issue Aug 14, 2019 · 2 comments
Closed

Version ambiguity #29

rwynne opened this issue Aug 14, 2019 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@rwynne
Copy link

rwynne commented Aug 14, 2019

The 'version' is represented as the date and time the conversion is run.

Would it be possible to comment the version/release of SNOMED in the OWL (e.g., January 2019 International, March 2019 US Edition, and so on)?

In \Full\Terminology, I think this could be represented from a .txt file name *_Full_VVV_YYYYMMDD.txt ?

@kaicode kaicode self-assigned this Aug 15, 2019
@kaicode kaicode added the question Further information is requested label Aug 15, 2019
@kaicode
Copy link
Member

kaicode commented Aug 15, 2019

Hi @rwynne

It sounds like you are using the "Snomed RF2 to OWL File Conversion" function.

Yes, the ontology version can be set using the -version parameter.

From README:

Optional parameters for OWL conversion:
...
 -version <version>                     (Optional) Date for the ontology version e.g. 20180731.
                                        Defaults to today's date.

We do not set this automatically because there are many scenarios for this function including converting work in progress.

I hope this helps.

Kind regards,
Kai

@rwynne
Copy link
Author

rwynne commented Aug 26, 2019

@kaicode
An understandable limitation.
To underscore the need for this, files are named ontology_<date-time ran>.owl , regardless the value taken from -version.

@kaicode kaicode closed this as completed in 957ad77 Jan 2, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants