-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 54
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
label in metadata in annotation resources inherits annotation context definition #1834
Comments
There is also a warning block in 5.5 that is not in sync with the rest of the document. |
This is what we would currently serialize as:
|
And the context solution:
|
Editorial discussion 2019-05-15 - Internationalization and consistency of the API is more important than 100% consistency with the W3C model. Only limited damage in the normal case for native annotaitons, compared to significant issues in the regular case for IIIF usage. Editors propose to take to TRC |
Copying comment from subsumed #1833 so we don't forget but can close that:
|
Approved by TRC in IIIF/trc#26 |
Related to #1833 but worse ... If an annotation collection, annotation page, annotation or content resource referenced in an annotation has the
metadata
property, the currently prevailing definition oflabel
is the one from the annotation context ... meaning it's a string. The same applies forrequiredStatement
as it inherits themetadata
pattern.Similarly the label of a
provider
on a content resource would inherit the annotation definition.This just seems terrible.
Propose that we reconsider our stance on label :(
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: