Why this library does not follow PSR standards?

[coderNeos]

Are there any plans to rewrite this library according to PSR standards?
There are few reasons to do that:

1. PSR is widely adopted standard in PHP community (all popular frameworks follow PSR)
2. It will be impossible to configure linter when trying to integrate this library in a codebase, which follows PSR

[pammel]

I'm sorry, it doesn't inspire much confidence when IMSGlobal wants to define standards on the one hand, but doesn't adhere to standards itself. It has now been more than one year since this problem was reported. Especially PSR-4 would be extremely important (Autoloader).

[MartinLenord]

Hi @pammel, this library was developed more as a testing and learning tool for the LTI specifications that can be used to try out changes and developments to the LTI specifications, and as such isn't really actively developed for purposes beyond that.

You might find a few better resources on https://github.com/IMSGlobal/ltibootcamp which has links to some other open sourced PHP libraries for LTI 1.3 that may better suit your needs like the one written by Open Assessment Technologies https://github.com/oat-sa/lib-lti1p3-core

I wish i had more time for improving this library, but as i don't work for the IMS or use PHP in my day to day work, i haven't been able to find much time to make those improvements