Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Dutch datasets are not displayed correctly under the INSPIRE themes #170

Open
wboersma opened this issue Dec 7, 2023 · 5 comments
Open
Labels
under development A solution is being developed

Comments

@wboersma
Copy link

wboersma commented Dec 7, 2023

In the new Geoportal not all the Dutch datasets are published under the INSPIRE themes.
For instance the theme Adressess, NL have 2 datasets, but none are shown under the INSPIRE theme Adressess. But when you look at the datasets at MS level, then the datasetse are in Geoportal.
How is this possible?

We have validated the datasets und they validate correctly.

MS-level:
image

Theme Addressess:
image

The same applies with other themes. for instance: Cadastral parcels, Statistical units, Population distribution — demography,

@PB-GNM
Copy link

PB-GNM commented Feb 5, 2024

In addition to this issue, we would like to know what criteria are used to decide wether a certain dataset is considered part of a theme and will there for be listed after a theme selection in the Geoportal.

We assume it has something to do with either the keywords, or the conformance, and the used title of the data specification in the conformance with this data specification or both. Sofar we were not able to determine which criteria are used on the bases of metadata of Dutch data sets that do come through and those that don't.

Could you please give us the exact criteria, so we can at least explain to our data providers why data sets are not shown any more when certain themes are selected.

Of course we would prefer less strict criteria as it used to be when this problem did not occur, since it will cost a lot of effort to convince the data providers to change this in their metadata

@PB-GNM
Copy link

PB-GNM commented Apr 15, 2024

In the meantime, we noticed that there is one clear distinction for all records that were not shown when selecting on a theme.
Those datasets have used an anchor like below:

gmd:keyword
<gmx:Anchor xlink:href="http://www.eionet.europa.eu/gemet/nl/inspire-theme/su">Statistische eenheden</gmx:Anchor>
</gmd:keyword>

Those without an anchor did appear in the Geoportal.
We also saw a different anchor in a recent MIG-T presentation:

gmd:keyword
<gmx:Anchor xlink:href="https://inspire.ec.europa.eu/theme/su">Statistische eenheden</gmx:Anchor>
</gmd:keyword>

So, we suppose that these should be changed.
Could you confirm that?

Best regards Pieter Bresters, Geonovum

@jescriu
Copy link

jescriu commented Apr 15, 2024

Dear @PB-GNM,
Thank you for your findings. We will definitively investigate this, which is directly linked to the way GeoNetwork process INSPIRE theme keywords, and do the indexation in Elastic Search subsequently.
The INSPIRE Geoportal frontend filters are using directly the content indexed by Eleastic Search.

@PB-GNM
Copy link

PB-GNM commented Apr 23, 2024

In the meanwhile, could you answer the following question with yes or no:

Is it still allowed to use <gmx:Anchor xlink:href="http://www.eionet.europa.eu/gemet/nl/inspire-theme/su">Statistische eenheden</gmx:Anchor> as a Keyword?

@jescriu
Copy link

jescriu commented May 27, 2024

Dear @PB-GNM,
I think this URL pattern is still accepted, but I will come back to you soon with an answer from the INSPIRE Validator team.
We will update the GeoNetwork indexation files used in the INSPIRE Geoportal accordingly, taking into account all possible URL patterns to declare the INSPIRE Themes.

@jescriu jescriu added the under analysis A first analysis is being performed label May 27, 2024
@jescriu jescriu added under development A solution is being developed and removed under analysis A first analysis is being performed labels Jun 17, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
under development A solution is being developed
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants