AF - Layer and styles should be changed

[JohannaOtt]

Change proposal description

The validator expects the layer "AF.Site", the TG defines "AF.Sites"
The validator expects the styles "AF.AgriculturalHolding.Default" and "AF.Site.Default", the TG defines "AF.AgriculturalHolding" and "AF.Site"

Addressed TG

Data Specification on Agricultural and Aquaculture Facilities – Technical Guidelines

Location

chapter 11

Issue faced

Should be aligned with values expected by validator

Proposed solution

Change AF.Sites to AF.Site, change AF.AgriculturalHolding to AF.AgriculturalHolding.Default, change AF.Site to AF.Site.Default.

[heidivanparys]

https://github.com/inspire-eu-validation/ets-repository/blob/28b66265aab8fc8228672283887475818aade1ab/service/vs-wms-soapui-project.xml#L2304-L2309

From the Data Specifications Template:

From the AF data specification:

@JohannaOtt

Change AF.Sites to AF.Site, change AF.AgriculturalHolding to AF.AgriculturalHolding.Default, change AF.Site to AF.Site.Default.

I think that more changes have to be done, as illustrated in the screenshots above.

[JohannaOtt]

I think that more changes have to be done, as illustrated in the screenshots above.

Looks good!

[heidivanparys]

Meeting 15-12-2021: The changes are fine, but we have to double-check the legislation.

[heidivanparys]

I noticed two more places in the DS that are affected:

[heidivanparys]

The relevant part of the legislation, from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:02010R1089-20141231#tocId16:

Article 14

Portrayal

1. For the portrayal of spatial data sets using a view network service as specified in Commission Regulation No 976/2009 ( 5 ), the following shall be available:

   (a) the layers specified in Annex II for the theme or themes the data set is related to;
   (b) for each layer at least a default portrayal style, with as a minimum an associated title and a unique identifier.

Regarding Site: the legislation says "AF.Site" as layer name, see https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:02010R1089-20141231#tocId947, whereas the TG currently says "AF.Sites".

The legislation does not say anything about the names of the styles, as far as I can see.

[sMorrone]

During the joint MIG/MIG-T meeting held on 31/03-01/04/2022, the proposal was endorsed.
More details in the meeting minutes on the 69th MIG-T meeting page