-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Docker registry reorganization: images validation and deletion (Harbor?) #1101
Comments
We're checking with EN if we're still planning to have the functionality listed above. For end of February we have as deliverable: @pcrespov, we were discussing about checking images metadata (I think we saw related error in the e2e test logs) this will cover I think "Better organization of docker images in registry (validation of metadata, deletion of faulty images)" About "information on which users have currently which studies open", I guess this is something we use before the releases, right? @matusdrobuliak66, are is this part of some of the scripts you wrote not so long ago, right? About "Web-Application Monitoring" and "Housekeeping": @mrnicegyu11, do you recall having done something about this in the past months? Something planned for the future? I remember you already had something to find corrupt projects (data). Is the following still relevant?
If the description of the milestone is not relevant anymore just let us know, as we might need to update/inform NIH. |
Yes we have a monitoring script that we use during releases, but even better I think this is covered by resource usage tracker |
Y7Q2 Status update (02/28/2024): Completed |
Description:
Develop DevOps infrastructure empowering users to perform more monitoring and troubleshooting tasks themselves, thus facilitating debugging and reducing the required SIM-Core manpower in the longer run.
Foreseen functionality includes:
Provide increased automation for the following routine DevOps tasks:
Web-Application Monitoring: Automatic collection of metrics upon any unexpected failures and nascent bugs, which will be used to assess the user-experience during our development cycles. This will help to assess if user experience degrades or improves and how much time for maintenance is required flexibly. There is no need to rely only on traditional, mostly slow feedback cycles (such as dissatisfied users’ email feedback)
Deliverable:
Extended DevOps infrastructure: registry, information on which users have currently which studies open
Acceptance criteria:
Infrastructure is in place that provides increased DevOps automation and web-application monitoring
Out of scope: –
Deadline:
Q1
wrike Y7-MS 7.1.2 DevOps Infrastructure and Automation (2/3)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: