You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Some proposals for next iterations on the static-webserver:
moving client compile as a stage of static-webserve/Dockerfile will accelerate image build (notice that make build-x always start compiling the front-end and cannot parallelize)
rename web/sever -> webserver so it follows the same pattern as the rest
move web/client outside of web. I suggest even outside services and have a clients folder so in the future we could even have multiple frontends? just a suggestion ...
@odeimaiz how do you feel about these changes (read last point above). This shall give the front-end even more independence . It is a first step to even connect to any backend while developing.
#3367 fulfilled first point. build time is reduced by a substantial amount as the client is now built in parallel with the other services instead of sequentially. CI is faster, as are local builds (30% improvement on a local dev machine for production builds)
Some proposals for next iterations on the static-webserver:
static-webserve/Dockerfile
will accelerate image build (notice thatmake build-x
always start compiling the front-end and cannot parallelize)web/sever
->webserver
so it follows the same pattern as the restweb/client
outside ofweb
. I suggest even outsideservices
and have a clients folder so in the future we could even have multiple frontends? just a suggestion ...Originally posted by @pcrespov in #2353 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: