Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

compare D455 & D415 depth quality #7820

Closed
xiebei opened this issue Nov 20, 2020 · 4 comments
Closed

compare D455 & D415 depth quality #7820

xiebei opened this issue Nov 20, 2020 · 4 comments
Labels

Comments

@xiebei
Copy link

xiebei commented Nov 20, 2020

Why does the D455 have so many holes compared to the D415? High Accuracy preset.
Is there any way to improve? thanks.

D415
Dingtalk_20201120092332

D455
Dingtalk_20201120092411

@agrunnet
Copy link
Contributor

Please use 848x480 for d455. Also set depth setting to “dense” and try to reduce the laser power when looking at near objects. This should all help a lot.

@MartyG-RealSense
Copy link
Collaborator

MartyG-RealSense commented Nov 20, 2020

I second the advice of @agrunnet above and would add that if you need a balance between accuracy and image fill then I recommend trying the Medium Density preset.

The images below are taken with D455 at 848x480 resolution.

Here is a scene on the Medium Density preset.

image

Below is the same scene on the High Density preset, which provides a bit more image fill.

image

More information about Visual Presets (also known as json) and their traits can be found in the link below.

https://dev.intelrealsense.com/docs/d400-series-visual-presets

You can also define your own custom configuration in the RealSense Viewer and export it as a json configurationfile using an option near the top of the Viewer's side-panel. This file can then be loaded back into the Viewer or loaded with program code into your own application.

image

@xiebei
Copy link
Author

xiebei commented Nov 23, 2020

ok, I will try it, thanks.

@xiebei xiebei closed this as completed Nov 23, 2020
@MartyG-RealSense
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks very much for the update @xiebei

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants