Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Question about 2D simulations #29

Closed
hongshul opened this issue Mar 12, 2019 · 2 comments
Closed

Question about 2D simulations #29

hongshul opened this issue Mar 12, 2019 · 2 comments

Comments

@hongshul
Copy link

hongshul commented Mar 12, 2019

Hi,

I run the 2D simulations and find strange phenomena.

When I choose PBF/IISPH/DFSPH/ProjectiveFluids as the simulation mehtod, the energy of the fluid is too sufficient. DFSPH even creates vortices.

When I choose PCISPH as the simulation mehtod, the fluid will explode.

Do you see these phenomenon?

Cheers

@janbender
Copy link
Member

Probably you tested the dam break 2D example. In this one I added the micropolar material model to add vortices. So that is a feature not a bug ;-) If you turn off the micropolar vorticity model, the vortices should not appear.

PCISPH is less stable than the other methods. We investigated this in more detail in our DFSPH paper if you want to know more about this. PCISPH therefore requires a lower time step size. Either take a smaller fixed step size or use a smaller CFL factor to solver this.

In general it is hard to find a parameter set that works for all solvers without decreasing the performance of the more stable methods.

@hongshul
Copy link
Author

Thanks for your answer.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants