Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Discussion elements #23

Open
Ipuch opened this issue Jun 22, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Discussion elements #23

Ipuch opened this issue Jun 22, 2023 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
Discussion element we should discuss on.

Comments

@Ipuch
Copy link
Owner

Ipuch commented Jun 22, 2023

METTRE DES ELEMENTS AUXQUELLES ON PENSE A LA VOLEE.

Reperes segementaires trop exotiques

Sahara et al 2006 : The scapula coordinate system is the clavicle coordinate system at abduction zero degree. The scapua frame is very exotic and not convertable to ISB standards.

Angles articulaires

  • Certains auteurs proposent des méthodes non standard :
  • Projection methods : Guttierez
  • Mettre les autres

Rythme thoracohumeral vs glenohumeral , raison technologique, ou pins no reason.

  • Charbonnier
  • Dal Maso
  • Zhang

Methodes de corrections:

  • Sulkar et al 2001 huméral ISB distal -> landmarks distaux
  • Methode de correction manquante qui ISB to glene.

Removed Graichen and Hallstrom

@Ipuch Ipuch added the Discussion element we should discuss on. label Jun 22, 2023
@Ipuch
Copy link
Owner Author

Ipuch commented Oct 22, 2023

How do we know that our dataset is better than skin markers data?
How far are we when using skin markers?
Does the data with offset still better than skin markers data ?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Discussion element we should discuss on.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants