New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
the point cloud looks a bit plausible and noisy #3
Comments
Thanks for your interest! I don't think there is anything wrong in your code. |
And one recent work claiming to address the smearing depth problem [Depth Completion with Twin Surface Extrapolation at Occlusion Boundaries. In CVPR 2021] |
Thanks so much for your prompt reply. |
PENet is efficient and the output depth image seems very nice, but the point cloud transformed from the depth inferred by PENet looks plausible and noisy. Is there something wrong with my matlab code used for transformation? Thank you.
depth2cloud.zip
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: