New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Experimental results using the NYU dataset #48
Comments
I cannot assert whether your results are normal since I don't save the experimental results on NYUDepth V2 dataset currently. But if you have reached a RMSE around 105mm, than it seems going on well. |
I am not certain now because I didn't save the experimental records. But one thing I can ensure is that ENet works on NYU Depth V2, though we don't officially release the codes and results. And we follow similar experimental setting (like NLSPN) on the indoor dataset. You could check your settings and codes more detailly. |
Thank you so much for confirming this to me! In this way, I think I don't have to change the network hahahaha! Thank you for your patience in answering!
|
But I still want to ask, can you provide the code for using the NYU dataset on PENet? I will be very grateful! |
I conducted my experiments with the NYU Depth V2 dataloaders uploaded previously in your issues as '.txt' files. You could remove the 'txt' post-fix and add them to the dataloader directory. However we might probably not formally update codes and results on NYUDepth V2 currently. |
Ok, thank you very much for your patient reply again! |
I think it is not necessary to upsample NYU figures into KITTI size. But I am not sure what point you are talking about. |
I think I know what's wrong. I now want to experiment with KITTI first and solve that problem at the same time. |
Hello, I am still training on PENet with NYU dataset, please help me to take a look. The third one in this graph is the predicted result, right? I think this also proves that this network can run on the NYU dataset, is that correct? Because I want to know if this network is suitable for a densely labeled dataset, thanks. Looking forward to your recovery.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: