You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
How many combinations should the software test to list all possible solutions for a given blockers pattern?
The red piece can be rotated or flipped in 4 different ways and it should be tested on 36 different cells, obviously some positions could have a blocker or another already placed piece but in terms of iterations just the red piece accounts for 4*36 combinations, this value has to be multiplied by the combinations of other pieces. This is a huge number and then listing all possible solutions for a given blockers pattern is not possible in a reasonable time.
What's your opinion?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi @adibacco , sorry for the delay in responding, I don't check GitHub too often nowadays. Couple of points regarding your questions:
I don't think 4*36 is a huge number (144), and you have to remember that (a) there won't be the full 36 possible places to check for because of blocker pieces, and (b) once you have a single piece in place, the number of possible locations for the next piece is also smaller because you have blockers and the first piece, and so on, and so on.
How many combinations should the software test to list all possible solutions for a given blockers pattern?
The red piece can be rotated or flipped in 4 different ways and it should be tested on 36 different cells, obviously some positions could have a blocker or another already placed piece but in terms of iterations just the red piece accounts for 4*36 combinations, this value has to be multiplied by the combinations of other pieces. This is a huge number and then listing all possible solutions for a given blockers pattern is not possible in a reasonable time.
What's your opinion?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: