Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

TOF performance fail for counter(paddle location, UP/DW) 23,24, vertical plane and counter(paddle location, S) 23 #802

Open
zihlmann opened this issue Apr 17, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@zihlmann
Copy link
Contributor

zihlmann commented Apr 17, 2024

the demonstrate the problem two plots are shown of PMT# 23 the TOP PMT of paddle location 23 (a single ended paddle)
for run 111790 (all good) and for run 120286 (bad). The plots show the hit time of the TDC minus the hit time of the adc on the vertical axis and the adc signal peak value on the horizontal axis. This plot is used to determine the time walk caused by the discriminator.

RUN 111790
PMT23_walk_run111790

RUN 120286
PMT23_walk_run120286

The time difference in the second plot clearly does not show a nice correlation between the time difference and the signal amplitude. A smilar distribution like this one would see if the TDC time is measured using its internal clock rather than the external clock provided by the DAQ. However, this is most likely caused by a "bad" cable connection between the discriminator and the TDC. Since this is seen in the four additional neighboring channels, so the last 5 channels of the connector but not the first 3 of this special cable used for this particular case it is most likely that there is a problem with the cable rather than the TDC. As a consequence these counters will cause a "gap" in the individual planes but not overall acceptance of the TOF as seen in the monitoring plots like this one:
Monitoring plot TOF2 run 120286
HistMacro_Matching_TOF2_Run120286
However, the efficiency for TOF points may be degraded.

@zihlmann
Copy link
Contributor Author

zihlmann commented Apr 17, 2024

To support the assumption of a "bad" cable here the readout list of the TDC in slot8:

  slot number="8" type="VX1290A">
  channel number="0" detector="TOF" plane="0" bar="31" end="DW"/>
  channel number="1" detector="TOF" plane="0" bar="32" end="DW"/>
  channel number="2" detector="TOF" plane="0" bar="33" end="DW"/>
  channel number="3" detector="TOF" plane="0" bar="34" end="DW"/>
  channel number="4" detector="TOF" plane="0" bar="35" end="DW"/>
  channel number="5" detector="TOF" plane="0" bar="36" end="DW"/>
  channel number="6" detector="TOF" plane="0" bar="37" end="DW"/>
  channel number="7" detector="TOF" plane="0" bar="38" end="DW"/>
  channel number="8" detector="TOF" plane="0" bar="39" end="DW"/>
  channel number="9" detector="TOF" plane="0" bar="40" end="DW"/>
  channel number="10" detector="TOF" plane="0" bar="41" end="DW"/>
  channel number="11" detector="TOF" plane="0" bar="42" end="DW"/>
  channel number="12" detector="TOF" plane="0" bar="43" end="DW"/>
  channel number="13" detector="TOF" plane="0" bar="44" end="DW"/>
  channel number="14" detector="TOF" plane="0" bar="45" end="DW"/>
  channel number="15" detector="TOF" plane="0" bar="46" end="DW"/>
  channel number="16" detector="TOF" plane="1" bar="23" end="N"/>
  channel number="17" detector="TOF" plane="1" bar="24" end="N"/>
  channel number="18" detector="TOF" plane="1" bar="23" end="S"/>
  **channel number="19" detector="TOF" plane="1" bar="24" end="S"/>**
  **channel number="20" detector="TOF" plane="0" bar="23" end="UP"/>**
  **channel number="21" detector="TOF" plane="0" bar="24" end="UP"/>**
  **channel number="22" detector="TOF" plane="0" bar="23" end="DW"/>**
  **channel number="23" detector="TOF" plane="0" bar="24" end="DW"/>**
  channel number="26" detector="TAC"/>
  channel number="30" detector="DIRC_REF"/>
  channel number="31" detector="RF" system="TOF" type="VX1290A"/>
slot>

and the picture showing the input cabling to the TDC:
TOF_lastTDC

channel 31 is the RF and channel 30 is the DIRC-Reference Signal channel 26 to 29 are not used

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant