You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thank you for your work. It has been very solid and made significant contributions in various aspects such as the dataset and experiments.
I have a few small questions that I would like to ask: In 4.1, it is mentioned that "On selected samples of the binary comparison task, we achieve an author-annotator agreement of 81.0% and annotator-annotator agreement of 70.0%."
How should we understand the "author-annotator agreement" and "annotator-annotator agreement"?
Both summaries are generated by the model, and in this case, humans only rank the two summaries. I can understand "annotator-annotator agreement" as the agreement between two annotators on the same sample.
But how should we understand "author-annotator agreement"?
I am looking forward to your reply. Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thank you for your work. It has been very solid and made significant contributions in various aspects such as the dataset and experiments.
I have a few small questions that I would like to ask: In 4.1, it is mentioned that "On selected samples of the binary comparison task, we achieve an author-annotator agreement of 81.0% and annotator-annotator agreement of 70.0%."
How should we understand the "author-annotator agreement" and "annotator-annotator agreement"?
Both summaries are generated by the model, and in this case, humans only rank the two summaries. I can understand "annotator-annotator agreement" as the agreement between two annotators on the same sample.
But how should we understand "author-annotator agreement"?
I am looking forward to your reply. Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: