Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Improved and fixed some argument definitions in fitparamodel #70

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jan 5, 2021
Merged

Improved and fixed some argument definitions in fitparamodel #70

merged 5 commits into from
Jan 5, 2021

Conversation

luisfabib
Copy link
Member

Closes #69

@luisfabib luisfabib added docs Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request labels Jan 2, 2021
@luisfabib luisfabib added this to the 0.13.0 milestone Jan 2, 2021
stestoll
stestoll reviewed Jan 4, 2021
View reviewed changes
deerlab/fitparamodel.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
deerlab/fitparamodel.py Show resolved Hide resolved
@stestoll stestoll merged commit 87d7e5e into main Jan 5, 2021
@stestoll stestoll deleted the fix/fitparamodel_refact branch January 5, 2021 18:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@stestoll stestoll stestoll approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
docs Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
0.13.0
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Unconstistent parameter definitions in fitparamodel
2 participants
@luisfabib @stestoll