feat: Add remove unversioned command #769
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
And this feature is available only since 1.9 |
|
I think the better solution would be to set vscode-variable svn_gt_1_9 to true or false and depending on that show or hide commands, but since |
|
My local prettylint does not complain about src/test/testUtil.ts, it actually has fixed it. ver 1.0.0 |
|
A better way would be to create a svn version context and then do a check on that |
|
done The problem with prettylint is actually with bash globbing |
|
Can you check that the changes i have made are working for you? |
|
Yep, working fine |
JohnstonCode
changed the title
JohnstonCode
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 7, 2020
# [2.4.0](v2.3.0...v2.4.0) (2020-01-07) ### Features * Add remove unversioned command ([#769](#769)) ([177bb0b](177bb0b))
|
🎉 This PR is included in version 2.4.0 🎉 The release is available on: Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The only thing that I would like to discuss with you is
logOutput. I've made it public since I think we must inform user whatever actually happened.I propose a global function, maybe in utils, which will log everything to outputChannel. Under the hood it will emit events, which output channel will be subscribed to.