You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
just like the screenshot on this webpage shows the performance of RND4K Q32T16 where T>0 is way too low. It should much higher than Q1T1 performance.
that's not reproduced with fio --threads and not reproduced with crystaldiskmark with the same drives.
to override: set T=1 and watch performance grow tenfold on NVME
nothing in the "Profile" menu so far
Steps To Reproduce:
use default profile and watch the result in 3rd line
note: since test folder is forced to be home folder, it's a bit struggle to test disk performance if home folder is encrypted
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Description:
just like the screenshot on this webpage shows the performance of RND4K Q32T16 where T>0 is way too low. It should much higher than Q1T1 performance.
that's not reproduced with fio --threads and not reproduced with crystaldiskmark with the same drives.
to override: set T=1 and watch performance grow tenfold on NVME
nothing in the "Profile" menu so far
Steps To Reproduce:
use default profile and watch the result in 3rd line
note: since test folder is forced to be home folder, it's a bit struggle to test disk performance if home folder is encrypted
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: