You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
According to the channel weighting policy, the videos displayed on the main page in Gleev should be highly dependent on the set weight. In general, this rule is observed. But some anomalies are observed. For example, the video https://gleev.xyz/video/103734 is always close to the top in Gleev. Previously, the weight of the channel https://gleev.xyz/channel/28593 was 1.3, then it was reduced to 1.1, then reduced to 0.9, then 0.13 and finally 0. During this time, the channel’s position remained at approximately 63rd place.
Also, the video https://gleev.xyz/video/696351 was at first at the top, but after a double reduction in the weight of his channel, it appears in about 53rd place. The channel weight was first 1.4, then it was reduced three times and is now 0.01. But the video's position did not drop much.
Perhaps the problem is some kind of caching?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thank you for submitting this, I don't know if we should spend time reviewing this carefully in light of upcoming recommendation system being rolled out.
According to the channel weighting policy, the videos displayed on the main page in Gleev should be highly dependent on the set weight. In general, this rule is observed. But some anomalies are observed. For example, the video https://gleev.xyz/video/103734 is always close to the top in Gleev. Previously, the weight of the channel https://gleev.xyz/channel/28593 was 1.3, then it was reduced to 1.1, then reduced to 0.9, then 0.13 and finally 0. During this time, the channel’s position remained at approximately 63rd place.
Also, the video https://gleev.xyz/video/696351 was at first at the top, but after a double reduction in the weight of his channel, it appears in about 53rd place. The channel weight was first 1.4, then it was reduced three times and is now 0.01. But the video's position did not drop much.
![image](https://private-user-images.githubusercontent.com/83884918/298803905-f15799ee-d4f8-42c6-b18c-f23f047ee91f.png?jwt=eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.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.OeV-6QC7-Nhs24jyjCenqr5eG2qXUj0ekfC--WDF_Lw)
Perhaps the problem is some kind of caching?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: