Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve documentation around available solvers #78

Closed
ablaom opened this issue Aug 17, 2020 · 2 comments
Closed

Improve documentation around available solvers #78

ablaom opened this issue Aug 17, 2020 · 2 comments
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects

Comments

@ablaom
Copy link
Member

ablaom commented Aug 17, 2020

I found I had to dig a bit to get this. Perhaps each doc-string states explicitly the solvers that are allowed (including full path for MLJ users, eg, MLJLinearModels.Newton())

Also there is a broken link on the Solvers section of the manual to table of models (which I don't think specifies the available solvers for each model as the docs intimate??).

@ablaom ablaom added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Aug 17, 2020
@tlienart
Copy link
Collaborator

Yes this is fair enough, I need to spend a weekend on this package and close off a few of the long standing issues

@ablaom ablaom added this to priority high / straightforward in General Jun 17, 2022
@ablaom
Copy link
Member Author

ablaom commented Feb 21, 2023

I think the recent doc-PRs address this.

@ablaom ablaom closed this as completed Feb 21, 2023
General automation moved this from priority high / straightforward to Done Feb 21, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants