Commit(s): JuliaLang/julia@8e5731d0508eba3717655f5cce5a0593a7384f34 vs JuliaLang/julia@d0e0e2341987b5b7955632c02a99af12a16c7f1e
Triggered By: link
Tag Predicate: "sort" || "union"
Note: If Chrome is your browser, I strongly recommend installing the Wide GitHub extension, which makes the result table easier to read.
Below is a table of this job's results, obtained by running the benchmarks found in
JuliaCI/BaseBenchmarks.jl. The values
listed in the ID
column have the structure [parent_group, child_group, ..., key]
,
and can be used to index into the BaseBenchmarks suite to retrieve the corresponding
benchmarks.
The percentages accompanying time and memory values in the below table are noise tolerances. The "true" time/memory value for a given benchmark is expected to fall within this percentage of the reported value.
A ratio greater than 1.0
denotes a possible regression (marked with ❌), while a ratio less
than 1.0
denotes a possible improvement (marked with ✅). Only significant results - results
that indicate possible regressions or improvements - are shown below (thus, an empty table means that all
benchmark results remained invariant between builds).
ID | time ratio | memory ratio |
---|---|---|
["union", "array", "(\"perf_countequals\", \"Bool\")"] |
0.81 (15%) ✅ | 1.00 (1%) |
["union", "array", "(\"perf_sum2\", Int64, true)"] |
1.31 (15%) ❌ | 1.00 (1%) |
["union", "array", "(\"perf_sum3\", Int8, true)"] |
0.79 (15%) ✅ | 1.00 (1%) |
["union", "array", "(\"skipmissing\", sum, Int8, false)"] |
1.26 (15%) ❌ | 1.00 (1%) |
["union", "array", "(\"sort\", BigFloat, true)"] |
1.01 (15%) | 0.66 (1%) ✅ |
["union", "array", "(\"sort\", BigInt, true)"] |
0.86 (15%) | 0.66 (1%) ✅ |
["union", "array", "(\"sort\", Bool, true)"] |
0.63 (15%) ✅ | 0.65 (1%) ✅ |
["union", "array", "(\"sort\", Float32, true)"] |
0.85 (15%) | 0.66 (1%) ✅ |
["union", "array", "(\"sort\", Float64, true)"] |
0.84 (15%) ✅ | 0.66 (1%) ✅ |
["union", "array", "(\"sort\", Int64, true)"] |
0.68 (15%) ✅ | 0.66 (1%) ✅ |
["union", "array", "(\"sort\", Int8, true)"] |
0.66 (15%) ✅ | 0.65 (1%) ✅ |
Here's a list of all the benchmark groups executed by this job:
["collection", "set operations"]
["micro"]
["sort", "insertionsort"]
["sort", "issorted"]
["sort", "mergesort"]
["sort", "quicksort"]
["union", "array"]
Julia Version 0.7.0-beta.46
Commit 8e5731d (2018-06-27 04:57 UTC)
Platform Info:
OS: Linux (x86_64-linux-gnu)
Ubuntu 14.04.4 LTS
uname: Linux 3.13.0-85-generic #129-Ubuntu SMP Thu Mar 17 20:50:15 UTC 2016 x86_64 x86_64
CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1241 v3 @ 3.50GHz:
speed user nice sys idle irq
#1 3501 MHz 36075895 s 278 s 3767847 s 749580739 s 7 s
#2 3501 MHz 165712196 s 0 s 2290558 s 623441279 s 4 s
#3 3501 MHz 22371652 s 2377 s 1850471 s 766892420 s 11 s
#4 3501 MHz 20898746 s 0 s 2127536 s 768231931 s 8 s
Memory: 31.383651733398438 GB (3593.9453125 MB free)
Uptime: 7.919159e6 sec
Load Avg: 0.9970703125 1.04052734375 1.4208984375
WORD_SIZE: 64
LIBM: libopenlibm
LLVM: libLLVM-6.0.0 (ORCJIT, haswell)
Julia Version 0.7.0-beta.44
Commit d0e0e23 (2018-06-27 03:06 UTC)
Platform Info:
OS: Linux (x86_64-linux-gnu)
Ubuntu 14.04.4 LTS
uname: Linux 3.13.0-85-generic #129-Ubuntu SMP Thu Mar 17 20:50:15 UTC 2016 x86_64 x86_64
CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1241 v3 @ 3.50GHz:
speed user nice sys idle irq
#1 3501 MHz 36188958 s 278 s 3777136 s 749736722 s 7 s
#2 3501 MHz 165898350 s 0 s 2299420 s 623524801 s 4 s
#3 3501 MHz 22505127 s 2377 s 1859504 s 767028343 s 11 s
#4 3501 MHz 21028842 s 0 s 2136451 s 768371556 s 8 s
Memory: 31.383651733398438 GB (5680.7890625 MB free)
Uptime: 7.921952e6 sec
Load Avg: 0.9970703125 1.0390625 1.47265625
WORD_SIZE: 64
LIBM: libopenlibm
LLVM: libLLVM-6.0.0 (ORCJIT, haswell)