New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[REVIEW]: Interplay between Chaos and Stochasticity in Celestial Mechanics #120
Comments
Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks. @dawbarton, @Datseris it looks like you're currently assigned to review this paper 🎉. Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post. ⭐ Important ⭐ If you haven't already, you should seriously consider unsubscribing from GitHub notifications for this (https://github.com/JuliaCon/proceedings-review) repository. As a reviewer, you're probably currently watching this repository which means for GitHub's default behaviour you will receive notifications (emails) for all reviews 😿 To fix this do the following two things:
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
|
@whedon generate pdf |
Failed to discover a |
Wordcount for |
|
|
👋 @Datseris, please update us on how your review is going (this is an automated reminder). |
👋 @dawbarton, please update us on how your review is going (this is an automated reminder). |
Hello, I'd like to submit my review. At the moment, I think this paper needs major revisions, according to the comments:
|
Just to add to Datseris' review -
Delta = transpose(dzt_dz0)*dzt_dz0
eig_val = eigen(Delta).values
FTLE[j, i] = 1/T * log(sqrt(maximum(eig_val))) As it stands, I'm not sure why this should be published. |
Hey @matteoettam09, please take a look at the reviews by @Datseris and @dawbarton. They've both expressed that a major revision of the paper / the repository is necessary. It would be great if you could comment on the raised criticism and could decide whether you want to move forward with this. |
Hello @carstenbauer, @Datseris, @dawbarton. Sorry, for the late feedback. In order:
We currently don't have the time resources to move forward with this, sorry, hopefully someone reading this thread read the work, its pain points and push it forward. |
Alright, I'm closing for the reasons above. In any case, thanks @Datseris @dawbarton for your reviews! |
@editorialbot reject |
Paper rejected. |
Submitting author: @matteoettam09 (Matteo Manzi)
Repository: https://github.com/matteoettam09/FTLE.jl
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch):
Version:
Editor: @carstenbauer
Reviewers: @dawbarton, @Datseris
Archive: Pending
Status
Status badge code:
Reviewers and authors:
Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) by leaving comments in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)
Reviewer instructions & questions
@dawbarton & @Datseris, please carry out your review in this issue by updating the checklist below. If you cannot edit the checklist please:
The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. Any questions/concerns please let @carstenbauer know.
✨ Please start on your review when you are able, and be sure to complete your review in the next six weeks, at the very latest ✨
Review checklist for @dawbarton
Conflict of interest
Code of Conduct
General checks
Functionality
Documentation
Paper format
paper.tex
file include a list of authors with their affiliations?Content
Review checklist for @Datseris
Conflict of interest
Code of Conduct
General checks
Functionality
Documentation
Paper format
paper.tex
file include a list of authors with their affiliations?Content
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: