Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add tests that check for things not being incredibly generally defined? #81

Closed
oxinabox opened this issue Aug 10, 2019 · 3 comments
Closed
Labels
testing Related to tests type constraints Potentially raises a question about how tightly to constrain argument types for a rule. See #232

Comments

@oxinabox
Copy link
Member

See

#77 (comment)

@nickrobinson251 nickrobinson251 added the testing Related to tests label Apr 29, 2020
@nickrobinson251
Copy link
Contributor

related to JuliaDiff/ChainRulesCore.jl#155

@nickrobinson251 nickrobinson251 added the type constraints Potentially raises a question about how tightly to constrain argument types for a rule. See #232 label Jan 1, 2021
@mzgubic
Copy link
Member

mzgubic commented Aug 5, 2021

Should we close this now that we have ProjectTo? Or did I misunderstand?

@mzgubic mzgubic closed this as completed Aug 5, 2021
@nickrobinson251
Copy link
Contributor

Xref #563

@oxinabox oxinabox reopened this Jan 13, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
testing Related to tests type constraints Potentially raises a question about how tightly to constrain argument types for a rule. See #232
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants