Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

WIP: Two stage method #7

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

WIP: Two stage method #7

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

shivin9
Copy link

@shivin9 shivin9 commented Mar 19, 2017

An attempt to implement the two-stage method without using Optim.jl. Still it has some dimentionality issues though.
I am using curve_fit to find the optimal parameters beta_0 and beta_1.
@ChrisRackauckas do you think this can work?

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Mar 19, 2017

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-27.4%) to 54.762% when pulling 8b7a946 on shivin9:two_stage_mthd into bb0c788 on JuliaDiffEq:master.

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Mar 19, 2017

Codecov Report

Merging #7 into master will decrease coverage by 27.38%.
The diff coverage is 0%.

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master       #7       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   82.14%   54.76%   -27.39%     
===========================================
  Files           1        1               
  Lines          56       84       +28     
===========================================
  Hits           46       46               
- Misses         10       38       +28
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/DiffEqParamEstim.jl 54.76% <0%> (-27.39%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update bb0c788...8b7a946. Read the comment docs.

@ChrisRackauckas
Copy link
Member

See #4 (comment)

@ChrisRackauckas
Copy link
Member

Closing this because an implementation was just merged. However, there's still some to be done along these lines, like #10 .

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants