New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use new call overloading #134
Comments
Yes, although, like PyCall, I'll probably wait till later in the release cycle to be breaking compatibility |
Great, and yes absolutely not a pressing issue as I will not switch to 0.4 dev anyway at this time. So then lets keeps this issue as a reminder. |
Should be a straigtforward matter of changing |
I tried
and
but neither worked. But this might still be because of my still non-existing macro foo. |
@tknopp,
|
yes thanks, that works. I needed to let the current macro definition stay there because lots of code with Gtk.jl uses the |
@vtjnash: Hi Jameson, if I get it right with Julia 0.4 we can have constructors even for abstract types. Do you think it would be feasible to get rid of the
@
names again? Or did I get this wrong...The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: