Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Attempt to run Julia (nightly) again for coverage numbers #82

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Feb 26, 2015
Merged

Conversation

jiahao
Copy link
Contributor

@jiahao jiahao commented Feb 18, 2015

This PR attempts to close #79 by rerunning Julia nightlies to generate coverage data.

It all seems to work, except that Coverage fails with an inscrutable error:

Coverage.MallocInfo[]
src/algorithms.jl
src/cie_data.jl
src/Color.jl
src/colormaps.jl
src/colormatch.jl
src/colorspaces.jl
src/conversions.jl
src/differences.jl
src/display.jl
src/maps_data.jl
src/names_data.jl
src/parse.jl
src/utilities.jl
ERROR: cfunction: return type of write does not match
 in associate_stream at /home/travis/.julia/v0.4/GnuTLS/src/GnuTLS.jl:299
 in open_stream at /home/travis/.julia/v0.4/Requests/src/Requests.jl:219
 in send_multipart at /home/travis/.julia/v0.4/Requests/src/Requests.jl:515
 in do_request at /home/travis/.julia/v0.4/Requests/src/Requests.jl:562
 in post at /home/travis/.julia/v0.4/Requests/src/Requests.jl:579
 in submit at /home/travis/.julia/v0.4/Coverage/src/Coverage.jl:217
 in process_options at ./client.jl:241
 in _start at ./client.jl:403

I'm not sure what could have changed in the past 4 days between build #116 and build #115 to cause this. And then there's build #118 where printing out the environment apparently circumvents this error. Any ideas @IainNZ ?

@jiahao jiahao force-pushed the cjh/fix-79 branch 2 times, most recently from 91d9f02 to 7bb9263 Compare February 26, 2015 01:20
jiahao added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 26, 2015
Attempt to run Julia (nightly) again for coverage numbers
@jiahao jiahao merged commit f5e4267 into master Feb 26, 2015
@IainNZ
Copy link
Contributor

IainNZ commented Feb 26, 2015

That looks like the issue fixed by this JuliaWeb/GnuTLS.jl#38 that was tagged here JuliaLang/METADATA.jl#2178

@jiahao jiahao deleted the cjh/fix-79 branch February 26, 2015 02:45
@jiahao
Copy link
Contributor Author

jiahao commented Feb 26, 2015

Inscrutable

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

test coverage % incorrect?
2 participants