any and all are bitwise?

[JeffBezanson]

I didn't expect this, and I suspect it's unintentional:

julia> all([1,3,5,7])
1

julia> all([9,12,14,15])
8

[ScottPJones]

The code (in reduce.jl, 333/334), and in functors.jl, looks intentional... AndFun() = x & y, OrFun() = x | y

[JeffBezanson]

Eh, I wouldn't put much stock in that. The author might have meant

call(::AndFun, x::Bool, y::Bool) = x & y

or meant to use &&.

[ScottPJones]

From the functors around them, it didn't look that way, but of course, I could be mistaken...

[ScottPJones]

I'm not saying either that it was correct, just that it looks intentional!

[PythonNut]

Are any and all meant for the same uses as Python's any and all?

[hayd]

I hope not, julia doesn't covert to Bool as fast and loose as python. You should explicitly write:

all(a .!= 0)  # or
all([x != 0 for x in a]) # better perf when julia gets generators and can drop the [] ?

to get the python behaviour.

[StefanKarpinski]

Similar to #10838

[fcard]

Bitwise any/all have been deprecated by #11774.