This issue was moved to a discussion.
You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Improve matrix multiplication and solvers #43799
Comments
Would be good to be clear what exactly is missing. Julia can definitely do diagonal/triangular matrix multiplies, it just wants you to use the appropriate types (ie Diagonal instead of plain matrix). It doesn't try to read off properties from the numerical values of the matrix (eg it won't do anything fancy with |
I believe Julia is currently missing optimized |
I have contacted the authors of the paper for input. |
Edit: at last I found it, they specify Julia 1.5.2, thus too old for this.
|
May I suggest that we use discourse to zero in on the problems and then open specific issues for each case that are actionable? If folks agree, we can close this issue. |
Alternatively, if you like, we can convert this issue to a GitHub Discussion - just click on the "convert to discussion link", which will close the issue and convert it to a discussion. |
This issue was moved to a discussion.
You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →
See
https://discourse.julialang.org/t/julia-vs-zig-surprise/74540/11
The Linear Algebra Mapping Problem. Current State of Linear Algebra Languages and Libraries
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: